Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in
the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email.
Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps —
claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the
rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it
off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode,
which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live
credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken
office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under
“Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call
904-383-7448.
Any overpayment of such tax as determined by the Commissioner shall be refunded. To
be eligible to receive a refund, a person shall submit a request for a refund within
one year after paying the tax. (Added 1959, No. 327 (Adj. Sess.), § 13, eff. March 1, 1960; amended 2025, No. 66, § 24, eff. July 1, 2025.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1980–2001 · leading case: Williams v. State, 589 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1990).
Williams v. State, 589 A.2d 840 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 4דWilliams then paid the tax and initiated an administrative proceeding, pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 8914, for a refund. The Motor Vehicles Department felt constrained to assume the constitutionality of the tax scheme and denied relief.”
Greg R. Barringer Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. Griffes, 964 F.2d 1278 (2d Cir. 1992). · cites it 3ד1 Concluding that *1280 Vermont’s administrative tax refund procedure, Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 32, § 8914 (1981), provides a plain, speedy and efficient remedy, and that therefore, the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.”
Christensen v. Griffes, 686 A.2d 964 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 2דFinally, taxpayers argue that this Court should order the Commissioner to pay interest on the tax refunds as a matter of state law under 32 V.S.A. § 8914 and V.R.C.P. 54(a). Section 8914 provides, "Any overpayment of [the purchase and use] tax as determined by the commissioner…”
Murray v. McDonald, 988 F. Supp. 420 (D. Vt. 1997). · cites it 2ד2 In Barringer I, the Second Circuit held that Vermont’s procedure for refunds of overpayments of its motor vehicle purchase and use tax pursuant to Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 8914 did not provide a plain, speedy and efficient remedy to taxpayers.”
Marsicovetere v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 772 A.2d 540 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 3ד§ 517 should not be applied to the purchase and use tax refund statute, 32 V.S.A. § 8914. He points out that the language of the refund statute does not refer to a statute of limitations.”
Trudeau v. Conway, 423 A.2d 854 (Vt. 1980). “The defendant argues that under 32 V.S.A. § 8914 the Commissioner has the discretion to determine the amount of any *168 tax refund.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.