Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 9202)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1975–2018 · leading case: Bedford v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 505 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bedford v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 505 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 8× “Taxpayers contend, first, that a privately-owned condominium unit cannot be considered a “hotel” within the meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 9202(3), and second, that booking fees and cancellation deposits do not constitute consideration for the “occupancy” of condominium units under the…”
In re Williston Inn Grp., 2008 VT 47 (Vt. 2008). “Taxpayer does not argue that the tax regulation at issue is contrary to 32 V.S.A. §9202(7). Rather, taxpayer argues only that the Commissioner misinterpreted the regulation.”
Depot Square Pizzeria, LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 169 A.3d 204 (Vt. 2017). “See 32 V.S.A. § 9202(10)(D)(ii)(I) (stating that taxable meal does not include food or drink "served or furnished on the premises of a school").”
Rock v. Dep't of Taxes, 742 A.2d 1211 (Vt. 1999). “§ 9280(a); see also 32 V.S.A. § 9202(4) (where operator is corporation, defining operator to “include any officer or agent of such corporation who, as an officer or agent of the corporation, is under a duty to pay the gross receipts tax to the commissioner as required by this…”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). “After a number of hearings, CVPS and the Department of Public Service entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that proposed a comprehensive settlement of issues raised in the proceedings. Among other provisions, the MOU embodied a modification of existing rates by…”
State v. Equinox House, Inc., 350 A.2d 357 (Vt. 1975). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(4) (Supp. 1975) defines operator, stating that “[i]n the event that an operator is a corporation, the term ‘operator’ shall include any officer or agent of such corporation who, as an officer or agent of the corporation, is under a duty to pay the gross receipts…”
Eurowest Cinemas, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2009 VT 2 (Vt. 2009). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(10)(C)(iii). Persons who charge for “taxable meals,” such as taxpayer, are required to collect meals-and-rooms tax on these sales.”
Expedia, Inc. v. State of Vermont Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(4). 2 Discovery thus should be relevant to this definition and to the transactions involved.”
State of Vermont Dep't of Taxes v. Hechanova (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “On September 1, 2009, the court denied the Department’s motion for summary judgment and Hechanova’s cross-motion for summary judgment.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(10)(C)(iii) — 1 case
Eurowest Cinemas, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2009 VT 2 (Vt. 2009). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(10)(C)(iii). Persons who charge for “taxable meals,” such as taxpayer, are required to collect meals-and-rooms tax on these sales.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(10)(D)(ii)(I) — 1 case
Depot Square Pizzeria, LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 169 A.3d 204 (Vt. 2017). “See 32 V.S.A. § 9202(10)(D)(ii)(I) (stating that taxable meal does not include food or drink "served or furnished on the premises of a school").”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(3) — 2 cases
Bedford v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 505 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1985). “Taxpayers contend, first, that a privately-owned condominium unit cannot be considered a “hotel” within the meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 9202(3), and second, that booking fees and cancellation deposits do not constitute consideration for the “occupancy” of condominium units under the…”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). “After a number of hearings, CVPS and the Department of Public Service entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that proposed a comprehensive settlement of issues raised in the proceedings. Among other provisions, the MOU embodied a modification of existing rates by…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(4) — 4 cases
Rock v. Dep't of Taxes, 742 A.2d 1211 (Vt. 1999). “§ 9280(a); see also 32 V.S.A. § 9202(4) (where operator is corporation, defining operator to “include any officer or agent of such corporation who, as an officer or agent of the corporation, is under a duty to pay the gross receipts tax to the commissioner as required by this…”
State v. Equinox House, Inc., 350 A.2d 357 (Vt. 1975). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(4) (Supp. 1975) defines operator, stating that “[i]n the event that an operator is a corporation, the term ‘operator’ shall include any officer or agent of such corporation who, as an officer or agent of the corporation, is under a duty to pay the gross receipts…”
Expedia, Inc. v. State of Vermont Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “32 V.S.A. § 9202(4). 2 Discovery thus should be relevant to this definition and to the transactions involved.”
State of Vermont Dep't of Taxes v. Hechanova (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “On September 1, 2009, the court denied the Department’s motion for summary judgment and Hechanova’s cross-motion for summary judgment.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(6) — 1 case
Bedford v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 505 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1985). “Taxpayers contend, first, that a privately-owned condominium unit cannot be considered a “hotel” within the meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 9202(3), and second, that booking fees and cancellation deposits do not constitute consideration for the “occupancy” of condominium units under the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(7) — 1 case
In re Williston Inn Grp., 2008 VT 47 (Vt. 2008). “Taxpayer does not argue that the tax regulation at issue is contrary to 32 V.S.A. §9202(7). Rather, taxpayer argues only that the Commissioner misinterpreted the regulation.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9202(8) — 1 case
Bedford v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 505 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1985). “Taxpayers contend, first, that a privately-owned condominium unit cannot be considered a “hotel” within the meaning of 32 V.S.A. § 9202(3), and second, that booking fees and cancellation deposits do not constitute consideration for the “occupancy” of condominium units under the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.