Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 9603)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1974–2010 · leading case: Polly's Props., LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 2010 VT 41 (Vt. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Polly's Props., LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 2010 VT 41 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 18× “32 V.S.A. § 9603(11), (15) & (24). [3] ¶ 9.”
Farmers Prod. Credit Ass'n v. State, 481 A.2d 18 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 7× “Pursuant to the Vermont state law on property transfer tax exemptions, 32 V.S.A. § 9603 (2), the Department promulgated a regulation purporting to clarify the scope of the exemp *584 tion for federal instrumentalities.”
Becker v. Becker, 416 A.2d 156 (Vt. 1980). “32 V.S.A. §9603(4) and (5). The fourth element which the plaintiff must establish is the defendant’s fraud.”
Wetherbee v. State, 315 A.2d 251 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 2× “§ 9602 imposes the tax, and, since the two transfers are not within the exemptions listed in 32 V.S.A. § 9603, the tax must be collected.”
In re O'Brien (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “Finally, the O’Briens argue that their property transfer tax exemption, under 32 V.S.A. § 9603(15), should be dispositive in the land records to demonstrate their retention of beneficial interest.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(11) — 1 case
Polly's Props., LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 2010 VT 41 (Vt. 2010). “32 V.S.A. § 9603(11), (15) & (24). [3] ¶ 9.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(15) — 1 case
In re O'Brien (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “Finally, the O’Briens argue that their property transfer tax exemption, under 32 V.S.A. § 9603(15), should be dispositive in the land records to demonstrate their retention of beneficial interest.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(2) — 1 case
Farmers Prod. Credit Ass'n v. State, 481 A.2d 18 (Vt. 1984). “Pursuant to the Vermont state law on property transfer tax exemptions, 32 V.S.A. § 9603 (2), the Department promulgated a regulation purporting to clarify the scope of the exemp *584 tion for federal instrumentalities.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(24) — 1 case
Polly's Props., LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 2010 VT 41 (Vt. 2010). “32 V.S.A. § 9603(11), (15) & (24). [3] ¶ 9.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(4) — 1 case
Becker v. Becker, 416 A.2d 156 (Vt. 1980). “32 V.S.A. §9603(4) and (5). The fourth element which the plaintiff must establish is the defendant’s fraud.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9603(ll) — 1 case
Polly's Props., LLC v. Dep't of Taxes, 2010 VT 41 (Vt. 2010). “32 V.S.A. § 9603(11), (15) & (24). [3] ¶ 9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.