Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9707 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 9707)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2016 · leading case: Bigelow v. Dep't of Taxes, 652 A.2d 985 (Vt. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bigelow v. Dep't of Taxes, 652 A.2d 985 (Vt. 1994). “The evidence shows that taxpayer used the boat for recreation in Vermont, did not advertise the boat for sale, and did not register with the Department as a dealer to collect sales and use tax as required under 32 V.S.A. § 9707. In addition, taxpayer did not obtain a dealer…”
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of Taxes, 2016 VT 69 (Vt. 2016). “During the period between June 1, 2004 and June 30, 2007 (the period), the dates at issue for both parties’ requests for bad debt refunds, lender was not a vendor registered with the Department for sales tax purposes under 32 V.S.A. § 9707 and therefore was not permitted to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.