Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 33 Chapter 52
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5231 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : PETITION, MERITS, AND DISPOSITION

(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 5231)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: In re A.W., 87 A.3d 508 (Vt. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re A.W., 87 A.3d 508 (Vt. 2013). “33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (explaining that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” but that standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence).”
In Re G.L., Juv., 2024 VT 60 (Vt. 2024). “; 33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (providing that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” while standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence); also compare, e.”
In Re X.D. & D.D., Juveniles (Vt. 2026). · cites it 2× “See 33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (providing with respect to juvenile proceedings that standard of proof on termination of parental rights is “clear and convincing evidence” while “[o]n all other issues, the standard of proof shall be a preponderance of the evidence”).”
In re A.W. & J.W., 195 Vt. 226 (Vt. 2013). “33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (explaining that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” but that standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5231(c) — 4 cases
In re A.W., 87 A.3d 508 (Vt. 2013). “33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (explaining that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” but that standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence).”
In Re G.L., Juv., 2024 VT 60 (Vt. 2024). “; 33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (providing that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” while standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence); also compare, e.”
In Re X.D. & D.D., Juveniles (Vt. 2026). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (providing with respect to juvenile proceedings that standard of proof on termination of parental rights is “clear and convincing evidence” while “[o]n all other issues, the standard of proof shall be a preponderance of the evidence”).”
In re A.W. & J.W., 195 Vt. 226 (Vt. 2013). “33 V.S.A. § 5231(c) (explaining that to terminate parental rights, court must make findings by “clear and convincing evidence,” but that standard of proof for “all other issues” is preponderance of evidence).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.