Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 33 Chapter 53
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 5307)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2023 · leading case: In re Appeal of T.O. & L.O., 2021 VT 41 (Vt. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Appeal of T.O. & L.O., 2021 VT 41 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 5× “In this appeal, petitioners argue that the Board has jurisdiction over their petition under 3 V.S.A. § 3091 because they are intended recipients of a “social service” from DCF, which they claim the agency failed to provide.”
In re A.S. & K.S., Juveniles, 2016 VT 76 (Vt. 2016). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(c). In addition, at a contested merits adjudication, all parties have the right to present evidence.”
In re M.S., 176 A.3d 1124 (Vt. 2017). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(g). Instead he was summarily dismissed without an opportunity to even state a position or seek to have parentage established.”
In re C.B., Juv., 2020 VT 80 (Vt. 2020). “Pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5307(e), at a temporary-care hearing, DCF is required to provide certain information to the court, including the identity of relatives that might be “appropriate, capable, willing, and available to assume temporary legal custody of the child.”
In re H.T. & M.L., Juveniles, 2020 VT 3 (Vt. 2020). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5307(f) (reliable hearsay testimony may be admissible in a temporary-care hearing).”
In re D.S., Juv., 2016 VT 38 (Vt. 2016). “Under 33 V.S.A. § 5307(f), “[a]ll parties shall have the right to present evidence,” but nothing in the statutory scheme requires it.”
In re M.S., Juv. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(g). Instead he was summarily dismissed without an opportunity to even state a position or seek to have parentage established.”
In Re K.P., Juv. (Vt. 2023). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5307(e)(5)(A) (providing that DCF should disclose to family court identity of possible relatives who may be appropriate to take temporary custody); id.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(c) — 2 cases
In re A.S. & K.S., Juveniles, 2016 VT 76 (Vt. 2016). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(c). In addition, at a contested merits adjudication, all parties have the right to present evidence.”
In re Appeal of T.O. & L.O., 2021 VT 41 (Vt. 2021). “In this appeal, petitioners argue that the Board has jurisdiction over their petition under 3 V.S.A. § 3091 because they are intended recipients of a “social service” from DCF, which they claim the agency failed to provide.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(e) — 1 case
In re C.B., Juv., 2020 VT 80 (Vt. 2020). “Pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 5307(e), at a temporary-care hearing, DCF is required to provide certain information to the court, including the identity of relatives that might be “appropriate, capable, willing, and available to assume temporary legal custody of the child.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(e)(2) — 1 case
In re Appeal of T.O. & L.O., 2021 VT 41 (Vt. 2021). “In this appeal, petitioners argue that the Board has jurisdiction over their petition under 3 V.S.A. § 3091 because they are intended recipients of a “social service” from DCF, which they claim the agency failed to provide.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(e)(5)(A) — 1 case
In Re K.P., Juv. (Vt. 2023). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5307(e)(5)(A) (providing that DCF should disclose to family court identity of possible relatives who may be appropriate to take temporary custody); id.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(f) — 2 cases
In re H.T. & M.L., Juveniles, 2020 VT 3 (Vt. 2020). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5307(f) (reliable hearsay testimony may be admissible in a temporary-care hearing).”
In re D.S., Juv., 2016 VT 38 (Vt. 2016). “Under 33 V.S.A. § 5307(f), “[a]ll parties shall have the right to present evidence,” but nothing in the statutory scheme requires it.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(g) — 2 cases
In re M.S., 176 A.3d 1124 (Vt. 2017). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(g). Instead he was summarily dismissed without an opportunity to even state a position or seek to have parentage established.”
In re M.S., Juv. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “33 V.S.A. § 5307(g). Instead he was summarily dismissed without an opportunity to even state a position or seek to have parentage established.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5307(h) — 1 case
In re Appeal of T.O. & L.O., 2021 VT 41 (Vt. 2021). “In this appeal, petitioners argue that the Board has jurisdiction over their petition under 3 V.S.A. § 3091 because they are intended recipients of a “social service” from DCF, which they claim the agency failed to provide.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.