Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-302 (2026)

Dockets, indices, and order books; when hearings and records private; right to public hearing; presence of juvenile in court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Every juvenile court shall keep a separate docket of cases arising under this law.

B. Every circuit court shall keep a separate docket, index, and, for entry of its orders, a separate order book or file for cases on appeal from the juvenile court except (i) cases involving support pursuant to § 20-61 or subdivision A 3 or subsection F or L of § 16.1-241; (ii) cases involving criminal offenses committed by adults which are commenced on a warrant or a summons as described in Title 19.2; and (iii) cases involving civil commitments of adults pursuant to Title 37.2. Such cases shall be docketed on the appropriate docket and the orders in such cases shall be entered in the appropriate order book as used with similar cases commenced in circuit court. In any child or spousal support case appealed to the circuit court, the case files shall be open for inspection only as provided by § 16.1-305.01.

C. The general public shall be excluded from all juvenile court hearings and only such persons admitted as the judge shall deem proper. However, proceedings in cases involving an adult charged with a crime and hearings held on a petition or warrant alleging that a juvenile fourteen years of age or older committed an offense which would be a felony if committed by an adult shall be open. Subject to the provisions of subsection D for good cause shown, the court may, sua sponte or on motion of the accused or the attorney for the Commonwealth close the proceedings. If the proceedings are closed, the court shall state in writing its reasons and the statement shall be made a part of the public record.

D. In any hearing held for the purpose of adjudicating an alleged violation of any criminal law, or law defining a traffic infraction, the juvenile or adult so charged shall have a right to be present and shall have the right to a public hearing unless expressly waived by such person. The chief judge may provide by rule that any juvenile licensed to operate a motor vehicle who has been charged with a traffic infraction may waive court appearance and admit to the infraction or infractions charged if he or she and a parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the juvenile appear in person at the court or before a magistrate or sign and either mail or deliver to the court or magistrate a written form of appearance, plea and waiver, provided that the written form contains the notarized signature of the parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the juvenile. An emancipated juvenile charged with a traffic infraction shall have the opportunity to waive court appearance and admit to the infraction or infractions if he or she appears in person at the court or before a magistrate or signs and either mails or delivers to the court or magistrate a written form of appearance, plea, and waiver, provided that the written plea form containing the signature of the emancipated juvenile is accompanied by a notarized sworn statement which details the facts supporting the claim of emancipated status. Whenever the sole purpose of a proceeding is to determine the custody of a child of tender years, the presence of such juvenile in court may be waived by the judge at any stage thereof.

Code 1950, § 16.1-162; 1956, c. 555; 1958, c. 353; 1971, Ex. Sess., c. 228; 1975, c. 334; 1977, cc. 559, 585; 1978, c. 605; 1979, c. 393; 1983, c. 293; 1996, cc. 755, 914; 2018, c. 18.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Hertz v. Times-World Corp., 528 S.E.2d 458 (Va. 2000).
Hertz v. Times-World Corp., 528 S.E.2d 458 (Va. 2000). · cites it 36× “Counsel for Ross, relying upon Code § 16.1-302 [*] , requested that the juvenile and domestic relations district court exclude the public and news media from the consolidated preliminary hearing.”
Doe v. Merten, 219 F.R.D. 387 (E.D. Va. 2004). · cites it 3× “, Va.Code § 16.1-302 ("The general public shall be excluded from all juvenile court hearings and only such persons admitted as the judge shall deem proper.”
In re Times-World Corp., 50 Va. Cir. 25 (Bedford Cir. Ct. 1999). · cites it 32× “) In response, the petitioners filed this petition for the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the following: (1) the lower court’s ruling excluding the press be reversed and vacated as being violative of Virginia Code § 16.1-302, the First Amendment of the United States…”
Bailey (W.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 2× “, Va. Code Ann. §§ 16.1-302 (C) (“The general public shall be excluded from all juvenile court hearings and only such persons admitted as the judge shall deem proper.”
Commonwealth v. Eubanks, 26 Va. Cir. 344 (Charlottesville Cir. Ct. 1992). · cites it 4× “In opposing the motion to unseal the files, the defendants rely on Va. Code §§ 16.1-302, 16.1-305, and 16.1-307.”
Warren A. Picciolo, Guardian ad litem v. Shannon Shifflett & Elvis Gene Shifflett, Sr. (Va. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Upon noticing the reporter’s presence in the courtroom, HRSSD and the children’s guardian ad litem (collectively, appellants) moved to close the entire hearing to the public, arguing that Code §§ 16.1-302 and 17.1-513.1 each mandated the complete closure of the parental abuse…”
Harrisonburg Rockingham Soc. Servs. Dist. v. Shannon Shifflett & Elvis Gene Shifflett, Sr. (Va. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Upon noticing the reporter’s presence in the courtroom, HRSSD and the children’s guardian ad litem (collectively, appellants) moved to close the entire hearing to the public, arguing that Code §§ 16.1-302 and 17.1-513.1 each mandated the complete closure of the parental abuse…”
Camellia Lou Fries v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 3× “Fries and Roadcap requested a public hearing pursuant to Code § 16.1-302. Fries' sister waived her right to a public trial as permitted by Code § 16.”
Wilcox v. Fourqurean, 17 Va. Cir. 68 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1989). · cites it 3× “1-302, the statute at issue in this case, provides in pertinent part: "the general public shall be excluded from all juvenile court hearings and only such persons admitted as the judge shall deem proper . ..." (emphasis added). Clearly this statute grants discretion to a…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-302(C) — 2 cases
Hertz v. Times-World Corp., 528 S.E.2d 458 (Va. 2000). “Counsel for Ross, relying upon Code § 16.1-302 [*] , requested that the juvenile and domestic relations district court exclude the public and news media from the consolidated preliminary hearing.”
In re Times-World Corp., 50 Va. Cir. 25 (Bedford Cir. Ct. 1999). “) In response, the petitioners filed this petition for the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the following: (1) the lower court’s ruling excluding the press be reversed and vacated as being violative of Virginia Code § 16.1-302, the First Amendment of the United States…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.