Va. Code » Title 17.1. Courts of Record » Chapter 8. Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 17.1-800 (2026)

Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission created

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There is hereby created within the judicial branch as an agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission, hereinafter referred to in this chapter as the Commission.

1994, 2nd Sp. Sess., cc. 1, 2, § 17-232; 1998, c. 872.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: Luttrell v. Commonwealth, 592 S.E.2d 752 (Va. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Luttrell v. Commonwealth, 592 S.E.2d 752 (Va. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “In all felony cases, other than Class 1 felonies, the court shall (i) have presented to it the appropriate discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets and (ii) review and consider the suitability of the applicable discretionary sentencing guidelines established pursuant to…”
Woodard v. Commonwealth, 754 S.E.2d 309 (Va. 2014). · cites it 2× “This argument misapprehends the discretionary nature of the sentencing guidelines.”
Samuel Wayne Hale v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 0112223 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2022). · cites it 2× “See Code §§ 17.1-800 to -806. VCC references are required inclusions in “any criminal .”
Mark Marsh v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 0552222 (Va. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2023). · cites it 2× “See Code §§ 17.1-800 to -806. VCC references are required inclusions in “any criminal .”
Nelson Rafael Melendez v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1185094 (Va. Ct. App. May 4, 2010). “01(A) provides as follows: In all felony cases, other than Class 1 felonies, the court shall (i) have presented to it the appropriate discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets and (ii) review and consider the suitability of the applicable discretionary sentencing guidelines…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.