Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-256 (2026)
Conspiracy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who conspires to commit any offense defined in this article or in the Drug Control Act (§ 54.1-3400 et seq.) is punishable by imprisonment or fine or both which may not be less than the minimum punishment nor exceed the maximum punishment prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
Code 1950, § 54-524.104; 1970, c. 650; 1972, c. 798; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1978, c. 130.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Fortune v. Commonwealth, 406 S.E.2d 47 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
Fortune v. Commonwealth, 406 S.E.2d 47 (Va. Ct. App. 1991). “His appeal raises two issues: (1) whether an accused may be convicted under Code § 18.2-256 for conspiring to distribute cocaine with a police officer and the officer’s confidential informant, and (2) whether the trial judge abused discretion in sentencing Fortune.”
Wooten v. Commonwealth, 368 S.E.2d 693 (Va. 1988). “In this criminal case, the question for decision is whether a single agreement to commit several drug-related crimes can form the basis for multiple convictions under the narcotics conspiracy statute, Code § 18.2-256. Defendant Alonzo Nathaniel Wooten was convicted in the…”
Boyd v. Commonwealth, 374 S.E.2d 301 (Va. 1988). “— Notwithstanding any other provision of this article or of § 18.2-256 [punishing drug-related conspiracy], in any case where a defendant has been tried and convicted of an act he has also conspired to commit, such defendant shall be subject to conviction only for the completed…”
Merritt v. Commonwealth, 704 S.E.2d 158 (Va. Ct. App. 2011). “01; and conspiracy to possess ecstasy with intent to distribute in violation of Code § 18.2-256. The Commonwealth's theory was that Merritt served as the "muscle" in an illegal narcotics scheme in which his role was to safeguard the transportation of a large quantity of ecstasy…”
Langhorne v. Commonwealth, 409 S.E.2d 476 (Va. Ct. App. 1991). “2-248 and conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of Code §§ 18.2-256 and 18.2-248. The trial court sentenced Langhorne in accordance with the jury verdicts to thirty years imprisonment and a $20,000 fine.”
Kelso v. Commonwealth, 698 S.E.2d 263 (Va. Ct. App. 2010). “1, coupled with Code § 18.2-256’s proscription against conspiring to commit a drug crime constitutes the continuing offense of conspiracy to distribute marijuana.”
Merritt v. Commonwealth, 689 S.E.2d 757 (Va. Ct. App. 2010). “01; and conspiracy to distribute MDMA, Code § 18.2-256. Merritt was sentenced by the trial court to eighteen (18) years in the Virginia State Penitentiary with eleven (11) of those years suspended for a period of eleven (11) years of indeterminate supervised probation.”
Zuniga v. Commonwealth, 375 S.E.2d 381 (Va. Ct. App. 1988). “Patrick Edward Zuniga was convicted of conspir- acy to distribute cocaine in violation of Code §§ 18.2-256 and 18.2-248. He was sentenced to forty years in the state penitentiary with twenty-two years suspended and was fined $10,000.”
Nichols v. Commonwealth, 369 S.E.2d 218 (Va. Ct. App. 1988). “, appeals his conviction of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of Code §§ 18.2-256 and 18.2-248, contending that: (1) his sixth amendment right to confrontation was violated when the trial court did not strike the direct testimony of a co-conspirator after he refused…”
Graves v. Commonwealth, 363 S.E.2d 705 (Va. 1988). “, that he “feloniously did conspire with others to distribute marijuana in an amount in excess of one-half ounce” in violation of Code § 18.2-256. In a final order entered December 3, 1985, the court sentenced Graves to a term of five years imprisonment with four years suspended…”
Smith v. Commonwealth, 496 S.E.2d 117 (Va. Ct. App. 1998). “2, and one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of Code § 18.2-256. Defendant contends the trial court erred when it: (1) ruled that a general *623 order regarding the filing of a “PD-256” confiscation form was irrelevant, (2) ruled that the parking lot of a…”
Kelso v. Com., 710 S.E.2d 470 (Va. 2011). “NOTES [1] Kelso also was indicted and convicted of conspiracy to distribute more than five pounds of marijuana in violation of Code §§ 18.2-256 and 18.2-248.1. That conviction is not the subject of this appeal.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-256(1) — 1 case
Therese Stroupe v. Sonia Rivero, Commissoner (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-256(5) — 1 case
Therese Stroupe v. Sonia Rivero, Commissoner (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.