A. Pursuant to any proceeding arising under subsection L of § 16.1-241 or upon the entry of a decree providing (i) for the dissolution of a marriage, (ii) for a divorce, whether from the bond of matrimony or from bed and board, (iii) that neither party is entitled to a divorce, or (iv) for separate maintenance, the court may make such further decree as it shall deem expedient concerning the maintenance and support of the spouses, notwithstanding a party's failure to prove his grounds for divorce, provided that a claim for support has been properly pled by the party seeking support. However, the court shall have no authority to decree maintenance and support payable by the estate of a deceased spouse.
B. Any maintenance and support shall be subject to the provisions of § 20-109, and no permanent maintenance and support shall be awarded from a spouse if there exists in such spouse's favor a ground of divorce under the provisions of subdivision A (1) of § 20-91. However, the court may make such an award notwithstanding the existence of such ground if the court determines from clear and convincing evidence, that a denial of support and maintenance would constitute a manifest injustice, based upon the respective degrees of fault during the marriage and the relative economic circumstances of the parties.
C. The court, in its discretion, may decree that maintenance and support of a spouse be made in periodic payments for a defined duration, or in periodic payments for an undefined duration, or in a lump sum award, or in any combination thereof.
D. In addition to or in lieu of an award pursuant to subsection C, the court may reserve the right of a party to receive support in the future. In any case in which the right to support is so reserved, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the reservation will continue for a period equal to 50 percent of the length of time between the date of the marriage and the date of separation. Once granted, the duration of such a reservation shall not be subject to modification. Unless otherwise provided by stipulation or contract executed on or after July 1, 2020, or unless otherwise ordered by the court on or after July 1, 2020, a party seeking to exercise his right to support so reserved shall be required to prove a material change of circumstances as a prerequisite for the court to consider exercise of such reservation.
E. The court, in determining whether to award support and maintenance for a spouse, shall consider the circumstances and factors which contributed to the dissolution of the marriage, specifically including adultery and any other ground for divorce under the provisions of subdivision A (3) or (6) of § 20-91 or § 20-95. In determining the nature, amount and duration of an award pursuant to this section, the court shall consider the following:
1. The obligations, needs and financial resources of the parties, including but not limited to income from all pension, profit sharing or retirement plans, of whatever nature;
2. The standard of living established during the marriage;
3. The duration of the marriage;
4. The age and physical and mental condition of the parties and any special circumstances of the family;
5. The extent to which the age, physical or mental condition or special circumstances of any child of the parties would make it appropriate that a party not seek employment outside of the home;
6. The contributions, monetary and nonmonetary, of each party to the well-being of the family;
7. The property interests of the parties, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;
8. The provisions made with regard to the marital property under § 20-107.3;
9. The earning capacity, including the skills, education and training of the parties and the present employment opportunities for persons possessing such earning capacity;
10. The opportunity for, ability of, and the time and costs involved for a party to acquire the appropriate education, training and employment to obtain the skills needed to enhance his earning ability;
11. The decisions regarding employment, career, economics, education and parenting arrangements made by the parties during the marriage and their effect on present and future earning potential, including the length of time one or both of the parties have been absent from the job market;
12. The extent to which either party has contributed to the attainment of education, training, career position or profession of the other party; and
13. Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party and the circumstances and factors that contributed to the dissolution, specifically including any ground for divorce, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties.
F. In contested cases in the circuit courts, any order granting, reserving or denying a request for spousal support shall be accompanied by written findings and conclusions of the court identifying the factors in subsection E which support the court's order. Any order granting or reserving any request for spousal support shall state whether the retirement of either party was contemplated by the court and specifically considered by the court in making its award, and, if so, the order shall state the facts the court contemplated and specifically considered as to the retirement of the party. If the court awards periodic support for a defined duration, such findings shall identify the basis for the nature, amount and duration of the award and, if appropriate, a specification of the events and circumstances reasonably contemplated by the court which support the award.
G. For purposes of this section and § 20-109, "date of separation" means the earliest date at which the parties are physically separated and at least one party intends such separation to be permanent provided the separation is continuous thereafter and "defined duration" means a period of time (i) with a specific beginning and ending date or (ii) specified in relation to the occurrence or cessation of an event or condition other than death or termination pursuant to § 20-110.
H. Where there are no minor children whom the parties have a mutual duty to support, an order directing the payment of spousal support, including those orders confirming separation agreements, entered on or after October 1, 1985, whether they are original orders or modifications of existing orders, shall contain the following:
1. If known, the name, date of birth, and social security number of each party and, unless otherwise ordered, each party's residential and, if different, mailing address, residential and employer telephone number, and number appearing on a driver's license or other document issued under Chapter 3 (§ 46.2-300 et seq.) of Title 46.2 or the comparable law of another jurisdiction, and the name and address of each party's employer; however, when a protective order has been issued or the court otherwise finds reason to believe that a party is at risk of physical or emotional harm from the other party, information other than the name of the party at risk shall not be included in the order;
2. The amount of periodic spousal support expressed in fixed sums, together with the payment interval, the date payments are due, and the date the first payment is due;
3. A statement as to whether there is an order for health care coverage for a party;
4. If support arrearages exist, (i) to whom an arrearage is owed and the amount of the arrearage, (ii) the period of time for which such arrearage is calculated, and (iii) a direction that all payments are to be credited to current spousal support obligations first, with any payment in excess of the current obligation applied to arrearages;
5. If support overages exist, (i) to whom an overage is owed and the amount of the overage, (ii) the period of time for which such overage is calculated, and (iii) how such overage is to be paid;
6. If spousal support payments are ordered to be paid directly to the obligee, and unless the court for good cause shown orders otherwise, the parties shall give each other and the court at least 30 days' written notice, in advance, of any change of address and any change of telephone number within 30 days after the change; and
7. Notice that in determination of a spousal support obligation, the support obligation as it becomes due and unpaid creates a judgment by operation of law.
1982, c. 309; 1984, c. 456; 1988, c. 620; 1994, c. 518; 1998, c. 604; 2003, c. 625; 2016, cc. 477, 615; 2018, c. 583; 2020, cc. 196, 1227, 1246; 2024, c. 51.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
740
cases (
59 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case:
Congdon v. Congdon, 578 S.E.2d 833 (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
Congdon v. Congdon, 578 S.E.2d 833 (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 34× “The trial judge, the husband argues, misapplied the manifest injustice exception to Code § 20-107.1(B)’s statutory bar against awarding support to adulterers.”
Robinson v. Robinson, 648 S.E.2d 314 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 32× “1(F) The General Assembly amended Code § 20-107.1, effective July 1,1998, to add subsection (F).”
Gamble v. Gamble, 421 S.E.2d 635 (Va. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 44× “Pursuant to Code § 20-107.1, the final decree fixed Mrs.”
Moreno v. Moreno, 480 S.E.2d 792 (Va. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 37× “The [e]ourt determined the amount of the award based on the testimony as to the approximate split of the [husband’s] Army pension and the other evidence.”
Laura McGahey Roberts White v. David Carlton Wright, 737 S.E.2d 519 (Va. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 24× “Thus, to address these assignments of error on appeal, we must consider the spousal support statute, Code § 20-107.1, which states in pertinent part: C.”
Brandau v. Brandau, 666 S.E.2d 532 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 20× “Subsection B of Code § 20-107.1 eliminates the trial court’s discretionary authority to award spousal support in cases of adultery under Code § 20-91(A)(l) absent a showing of manifest injustice "based upon the respective degrees of fault during the marriage and the relative…”
Stubblebine v. Stubblebine, 473 S.E.2d 72 (Va. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 40× “Stubblebine requested, however, that the trial court award her spousal support under Code § 20-107.1 in addition to one-half of the retirement payments.”
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 23× “2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
Wright v. Wright, 564 S.E.2d 702 (Va. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 30× “On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by: (1) using Code § 20-107.1 to determine an award of final spousal support rather than Code § 20-109; (2) finding husband failed to prove adultery as a bar to spousal support pursuant to Code § 20-91(1); (3) finding husband had a…”
Joynes v. Payne, 551 S.E.2d 10 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 18× “Finally, Joynes contends that the trial court erred in failing to specify a termination date for the spousal support award, as required by Code § 20-107.1(C). “In awarding spousal support, the chancellor must consider the relative needs and abilities of the parties.”
Steven T. Russell v. Karen A. Russell, 759 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 48× “See Code § 20-107.1. Husband does not anywhere contend that the voiding of the spousal support award necessarily drags down with it the health insurance premiums.”
McKee v. McKee, 664 S.E.2d 505 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 24× “"In determining the amount of an award, the court must consider all of the factors set forth in Code § 20-107.1." Stubblebine v. Stubblebine, 22 Va.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(0) — 2 cases
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(1) — 25 cases
Moreno v. Moreno, 480 S.E.2d 792 (Va. Ct. App. 1997).
“The [e]ourt determined the amount of the award based on the testimony as to the approximate split of the [husband’s] Army pension and the other evidence.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(2) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(3) — 7 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(4) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(5) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(6) — 3 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(7) — 6 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(8) — 26 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(9) — 8 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(A) — 15 cases
Steven T. Russell v. Karen A. Russell, 759 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“See Code § 20-107.1. Husband does not anywhere contend that the voiding of the spousal support award necessarily drags down with it the health insurance premiums.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(A)(1) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(B) — 28 cases
Congdon v. Congdon, 578 S.E.2d 833 (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
“The trial judge, the husband argues, misapplied the manifest injustice exception to Code § 20-107.1(B)’s statutory bar against awarding support to adulterers.”
Brandau v. Brandau, 666 S.E.2d 532 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
“Subsection B of Code § 20-107.1 eliminates the trial court’s discretionary authority to award spousal support in cases of adultery under Code § 20-91(A)(l) absent a showing of manifest injustice "based upon the respective degrees of fault during the marriage and the relative…”
Wright v. Wright, 564 S.E.2d 702 (Va. Ct. App. 2002).
“On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by: (1) using Code § 20-107.1 to determine an award of final spousal support rather than Code § 20-109; (2) finding husband failed to prove adultery as a bar to spousal support pursuant to Code § 20-91(1); (3) finding husband had a…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(C) — 33 cases
Joynes v. Payne, 551 S.E.2d 10 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).
“Finally, Joynes contends that the trial court erred in failing to specify a termination date for the spousal support award, as required by Code § 20-107.1(C). “In awarding spousal support, the chancellor must consider the relative needs and abilities of the parties.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(D) — 23 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E) — 232 cases
Brandau v. Brandau, 666 S.E.2d 532 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
“Subsection B of Code § 20-107.1 eliminates the trial court’s discretionary authority to award spousal support in cases of adultery under Code § 20-91(A)(l) absent a showing of manifest injustice "based upon the respective degrees of fault during the marriage and the relative…”
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
Robinson v. Robinson, 648 S.E.2d 314 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
“1(F) The General Assembly amended Code § 20-107.1, effective July 1,1998, to add subsection (F).”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(1) — 47 cases
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(11) — 3 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(13) — 11 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(2) — 16 cases
Brandau v. Brandau, 666 S.E.2d 532 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
“Subsection B of Code § 20-107.1 eliminates the trial court’s discretionary authority to award spousal support in cases of adultery under Code § 20-91(A)(l) absent a showing of manifest injustice "based upon the respective degrees of fault during the marriage and the relative…”
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(3) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(4) — 3 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(5) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(6) — 7 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(7) — 8 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(8) — 39 cases
Steven T. Russell v. Karen A. Russell, 759 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“See Code § 20-107.1. Husband does not anywhere contend that the voiding of the spousal support award necessarily drags down with it the health insurance premiums.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(9) — 16 cases
McKee v. McKee, 664 S.E.2d 505 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
“"In determining the amount of an award, the court must consider all of the factors set forth in Code § 20-107.1." Stubblebine v. Stubblebine, 22 Va.”
Joynes v. Payne, 551 S.E.2d 10 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).
“Finally, Joynes contends that the trial court erred in failing to specify a termination date for the spousal support award, as required by Code § 20-107.1(C). “In awarding spousal support, the chancellor must consider the relative needs and abilities of the parties.”
Steven T. Russell v. Karen A. Russell, 759 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“See Code § 20-107.1. Husband does not anywhere contend that the voiding of the spousal support award necessarily drags down with it the health insurance premiums.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(l) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(E)(ll) — 2 cases
Joynes v. Payne, 551 S.E.2d 10 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).
“Finally, Joynes contends that the trial court erred in failing to specify a termination date for the spousal support award, as required by Code § 20-107.1(C). “In awarding spousal support, the chancellor must consider the relative needs and abilities of the parties.”
Miller v. Cox, 607 S.E.2d 126 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“2d 37, 40 (1991) (noting that “[s]pousal support awards under Code § 20-107.1 may ... exceed what is ‘necessary’ to maintain the spouse as the term is used in Code § 20-103” due to the litany of factors the trial court must review under Code § 20-107.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(F) — 73 cases
Robinson v. Robinson, 648 S.E.2d 314 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
“1(F) The General Assembly amended Code § 20-107.1, effective July 1,1998, to add subsection (F).”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(G) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(G)(1) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(H) — 4 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(H)(3) — 1 case
Steven T. Russell v. Karen A. Russell, 759 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“See Code § 20-107.1. Husband does not anywhere contend that the voiding of the spousal support award necessarily drags down with it the health insurance premiums.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(H)(5) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1(H)(6) — 5 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.