Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 25.1-312 (2026)

Reformation, alteration, revision, amendment, or invalidation of certificate

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. No reformation, alteration, revision, amendment, or invalidation shall be made to a recorded certificate for any purpose without the prior consent of the court wherein such certificate is recorded.

B. The court shall have jurisdiction to:

1. Reform, alter, revise, amend, or invalidate, in whole or in part, any certificate; and

2. Correct mistakes in the description of the property affected by such certificate, the name or names of the owner or owners in the certificate, or any other error that may exist with respect to such certificate for any other purpose.

C. A petition filed by the authorized condemnor with the court setting forth any error made in such certificate, or the necessity of any change therein, shall be deemed sufficient basis for the reformation, alteration, revision, amendment, or invalidation in whole or in part of such certificate.

D. The court may enter an order permitting the reformation, alteration, revision, amendment or invalidation, in whole or in part, of the certificate. Such order, together with any revised certificate that may be necessary, shall be recorded in the clerk's office in the same manner required for the recordation of a certificate. The filing of any certificate pursuant to the provisions of this section shall not alter the date of taking as established by the recordation of the original certificate pursuant to § 25.1-307 as to any property that is included in the amended certificate. An amended certificate shall not include any property not included in the original certificate.

E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit or preclude any person from recovering damages in a condemnation proceeding resulting from such reformation, alteration, revision, amendment, or invalidation.

2003, c. 940; 2019, c. 788.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: City of Chesapeake v. KH HR Two Great Bridge, L.L.C., 91 Va. Cir. 16 (Chesapeake Cir. Ct. 2015).
City of Chesapeake v. KH HR Two Great Bridge, L.L.C., 91 Va. Cir. 16 (Chesapeake Cir. Ct. 2015). · cites it 3× “On the second day of trial, the City filed a motion for leave to amend the certificate of take pursuant to Va. Code §25.1-312, and a motion to amend the petition for condemnation pursuant to Va.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.