Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Repealed by Acts 1999, c. 728, effective July 1, 2000.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–2000 · leading case: WBQ P'ship v. Commonwealth Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In Re WBQ P'ship), 189 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995).
WBQ P'ship v. Commonwealth Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In Re WBQ P'ship), 189 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995). “As to the second question, DMAS contends that it can collect a portion of the gain realized from the sale pursuant to Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (Michie 1992). Significantly, this Virginia statute authorizes DMAS to collect or “recapture” the gain either from the debt- or, or if…”
P.K.R. Convalescent Centers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Med. Assistance Serv. (In Re P.K.R. Convalescent Centers, Inc.), 189 B.R. 90 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995). “Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (MIchie 1992). In essence, debtor must reimburse DMAS for the amount of depreciation previously allowed as a reasonable cost of providing services to the program if debtor realizes a gain on the sale of the property.”
Virginia Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. v. Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P. (In Re Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P.), 248 B.R. 505 (W.D. Va. 2000). “The basis for this assertion is Virginia Code § 32.1-329. Because it has already been determined that this state statute is preempted by federal law, this argument also fails, (e)Ascend Plan is feasible.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 32.1-329(0) — 2 cases
WBQ P'ship v. Commonwealth Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In Re WBQ P'ship), 189 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995). “As to the second question, DMAS contends that it can collect a portion of the gain realized from the sale pursuant to Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (Michie 1992). Significantly, this Virginia statute authorizes DMAS to collect or “recapture” the gain either from the debt- or, or if…”
Virginia Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. v. Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P. (In Re Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P.), 248 B.R. 505 (W.D. Va. 2000). “The basis for this assertion is Virginia Code § 32.1-329. Because it has already been determined that this state statute is preempted by federal law, this argument also fails, (e)Ascend Plan is feasible.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 32.1-329(A) — 2 cases
WBQ P'ship v. Commonwealth Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In Re WBQ P'ship), 189 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995). “As to the second question, DMAS contends that it can collect a portion of the gain realized from the sale pursuant to Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (Michie 1992). Significantly, this Virginia statute authorizes DMAS to collect or “recapture” the gain either from the debt- or, or if…”
Virginia Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. v. Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P. (In Re Shenandoah Realty Partners, L.P.), 248 B.R. 505 (W.D. Va. 2000). “The basis for this assertion is Virginia Code § 32.1-329. Because it has already been determined that this state statute is preempted by federal law, this argument also fails, (e)Ascend Plan is feasible.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 32.1-329(C) — 1 case
WBQ P'ship v. Commonwealth Dep't of Med. Assistance Servs. (In Re WBQ P'ship), 189 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995). “As to the second question, DMAS contends that it can collect a portion of the gain realized from the sale pursuant to Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-329 (Michie 1992). Significantly, this Virginia statute authorizes DMAS to collect or “recapture” the gain either from the debt- or, or if…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.