Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 38.2-807 (2026)

Attorney fees

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In any action against an unlicensed insurer upon an insurance contract issued or delivered in this Commonwealth to a resident of this Commonwealth or to a corporation authorized to do business in this Commonwealth, the court may allow the plaintiff a reasonable attorney fee if (i) the insurer has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the contract for 30 days after demand prior to the commencement of the action and (ii) the court concludes that the refusal was vexatious and without reasonable cause. The fee shall not exceed 33 1/3 percent of the amount that the court or jury finds the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the insurer, but shall be at least $200.

B. Failure of the insurer to defend the action shall be deemed prima facie evidence that its failure to make payment was vexatious and without reasonable cause.

1952, c. 317, § 38.1-70; 1986, c. 562; 2010, c. 343.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: REVI, LLC v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 776 S.E.2d 808 (Va. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

REVI, LLC v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 776 S.E.2d 808 (Va. 2015). · cites it 24× “From the Recodification Act, the provision subsequently codified as Code § 38.2-807 stated: In any action against an unlicensed insurer upon an insurance contract issued or delivered in this Commonwealth to a resident of this Commonwealth or to a corporation authorized to do…”

— Va. Code Ann. § 38.2-807(A) — 1 case

REVI, LLC v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 776 S.E.2d 808 (Va. 2015). “From the Recodification Act, the provision subsequently codified as Code § 38.2-807 stated: In any action against an unlicensed insurer upon an insurance contract issued or delivered in this Commonwealth to a resident of this Commonwealth or to a corporation authorized to do…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.