Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-126 (2026)

Summons for unlawful detainer issued by magistrate or clerk or judge of a general district court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. For the purposes of this section, "termination notice" means a notice given under § 55.1-1245 or other notice of termination of tenancy given by the landlord to the tenant of a dwelling unit, or any notice of termination given by a landlord to a tenant of a nonresidential premises.

B. In any case when possession of any house, land or tenement is unlawfully detained by the person in possession thereof, the landlord, his agent, attorney, or other person, entitled to the possession may present to a magistrate or a clerk or judge of a general district court a statement under oath of the facts which authorize the removal of the tenant or other person in possession, describing such premises; and thereupon such magistrate, clerk or judge shall issue his summons against the person or persons named in such affidavit. The process issued upon any such summons issued by a magistrate, clerk or judge may be served as provided in § 8.01-293, 8.01-296, or 8.01-299. When issued by a magistrate it may be returned to and the case heard and determined by the judge of a general district court. If the summons for unlawful detainer is filed to terminate a tenancy pursuant to the Virginia Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (§ 55.1-1200 et seq.), the initial hearing on such summons shall occur as soon as practicable, but not more than 21 days from the date of filing. If the case cannot be heard within 21 days from the date of filing, the initial hearing shall be held as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days after the date of the filing. If the plaintiff requests that the initial hearing be set on a date later than 21 days from the date of filing, the initial hearing shall be set on a date the plaintiff is available that is also available for the court. Such summons shall be served at least 10 days before the return day thereof. If a summons for unlawful detainer is filed by an owner of a residential single family dwelling unit in the Commonwealth and the court finds based upon the evidence that (i) no rental agreement exists or has ever existed between the owner and the occupant; (ii) the occupant occupies such dwelling unit without permission of such owner; and (iii) the owner has given such occupant a written notice to vacate such dwelling unit at least 72 hours prior to the date of filing, an emergency hearing on such summons shall occur as soon as practicable, but not more than 14 days from the date of filing. If the case cannot be heard within 14 days from the date of filing, the emergency hearing shall be held as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days after the date of the filing.

C. Any summons issued pursuant to the provisions of this section shall contain a notice to the tenant that, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.2-465.1, it is unlawful for his employer to discharge him from employment or take any adverse personnel action against him as a result of his absence from employment due to appearing at any initial or subsequent hearing on such summons, provided that he has given reasonable notice of such hearing to his employer.

D. The court shall not enter an order of possession unless the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney, or agent has presented a copy of a proper termination notice issued to the defendant and the court has entered such notice into evidence.

E. Notwithstanding any rule of court or provision of law to the contrary, the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney, or agent in an unlawful detainer case may submit into evidence a photocopy of a properly executed paper document or paper printout of an electronically stored document including a copy of the original lease or other documents, provided that the plaintiff provides an affidavit or sworn testimony that the copy of such document is a true and accurate copy of the original lease. If the defendant fails to appear in court, the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney, or agent may introduce into evidence by an affidavit or sworn testimony a statement of the amount of outstanding rent, late charges, attorney fees, costs, and any other charges or damages as contracted for in the rental agreement that are due and owing as of the date of the hearing. The plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney, or agent shall advise the court of any payments made by or on behalf of the defendant that result in a reduction of the amount due and owing to the plaintiff.

F. 1. The plaintiff may include on the summons for unlawful detainer a request for all amounts due and owing as of the date of the hearing and the approximate amount the defendant may owe as of the date of the hearing if the defendant makes no payments prior to the date of such hearing. Notwithstanding any rule of court or provision of law to the contrary, if such request is made on the summons for unlawful detainer, the court shall permit amendment of the amount requested on the summons for unlawful detainer filed in court in accordance with the evidence and the amounts contracted for in the rental agreement. If the plaintiff makes such a request and additional amounts become due and owing prior to the final disposition of a pending unlawful detainer, a plaintiff may amend the amount in an unlawful detainer to request all amounts due and owing as of the date of final disposition.

If, however, the plaintiff has not included on the summons for unlawful detainer a request for all amounts due and owing as of the date of the hearing, the court may permit the plaintiff to amend the amount requested on the summons for unlawful detainer upon finding that (i) the evidence accurately sets forth the amount due and owing to the plaintiff, (ii) the plaintiff provided the defendant with a separate written notice of additional amounts due and owing as of the date of the hearing and of the plaintiff's intent to amend the amount requested on the summons, and (iii) the defendant had the opportunity at court to object to any additional amounts claimed.

2. If the plaintiff requests on the summons for unlawful detainer all amounts due and owing as of the date of the hearing or if the court grants an amendment of the amounts requested on the summons for unlawful detainer, the plaintiff shall not subsequently file additional unlawful detainers or warrants in debt against the defendant for such additional amounts if those amounts could have been included in the amended amount. Any such subsequent unlawful detainers or warrants in debt filed for amounts that were included in the amended amount shall be dismissed. Nothing in this section shall preclude the plaintiff from filing an unlawful detainer for a non-rent lease violation during the pendency of an unlawful detainer for nonpayment of rent or from filing a warrant in debt for amounts unrelated to the unlawful detainer against the defendant.

3. In determining the amount due the plaintiff as of the date of the hearing, if the rental agreement or lease provides that rent is due and payable on the first of the month in advance for the entire month, at the request of the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney or agent, the amount due as of the date of the hearing shall include the rent due for the entire month in which the hearing is held, and rent shall not be prorated as of the actual court date. Otherwise, the rent shall be prorated as of the date of the hearing. However, nothing herein shall be construed to permit a landlord to collect rent in excess of the amount stated in such rental agreement or lease. If a money judgment has been granted for the amount due for the month of the hearing pursuant to this section and the landlord re-rents such dwelling unit and receives rent from a new tenant prior to the end of such month, the landlord is required to reflect the applicable portion of the judgment as satisfied pursuant to § 16.1-94.01.

4. If, on the date of a foreclosure sale of a single-family residential dwelling unit, the former owner remains in possession of such dwelling unit, such former owner becomes a tenant at sufferance. Such tenancy may be terminated by a written termination notice from the successor owner given to such tenant at least three days prior to the effective date of termination. Upon the expiration of the three-day period, the successor owner may file an unlawful detainer under this section. Such tenant shall be responsible for payment of fair market rental from the date of such foreclosure until the date the tenant vacates the dwelling unit, as well as damages, and for payment of reasonable attorney fees and court costs.

Code 1950, § 8-791; 1954, c. 333; 1966, c. 436; 1968, c. 639; 1972, c. 397; 1975, c. 235; 1977, c. 617; 1978, c. 344; 1980, c. 502; 2000, c. 1055; 2008, cc. 551, 691; 2012, c. 788; 2013, c. 63; 2014, c. 168; 2015, c. 547; 2017, c. 481; 2018, c. 255; 2019, cc. 130, 132; 2022, c. 467; 2024, cc. 268, 331.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 787 S.E.2d 116 (Va. 2016).
Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 787 S.E.2d 116 (Va. 2016). · cites it 24× “In the 156 years since Warwick and the 70 years since Addison, the General Assembly has amended the provision currently codified at Code § 8.01-126 several times. See, e.g., 1870-71 Acts ch.”
Portsmouth Redevelopment & Hous. Auth. v. Ison, 66 Va. Cir. 336 (Portsmouth Cir. Ct. 2005). · cites it 5× “Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Portsmouth Redevelopment and Housing Authority (“PRHA”) filed a Summons for Unlawful Detainer, pursuant to Va. Code § 8.01-126, in the Portsmouth General District Court on May 8, 2003.”
Cooper v. Tazewell Square Apts., Ltd., 577 F. Supp. 1483 (W.D. Va. 1984). · cites it 3× “Va.Code § 8.01-126. See Anderson v. Denny, 365 F.”
Antonio Noah Lassiter v. Commonwealth, 620 S.E.2d 563 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “Code § 8.01-126 further provides in pertinent part the procedure regarding unlawful detainer actions: In any case when possession of any house, land or tenement is unlawfully detained by the person in possession thereof, the landlord .”
Destini Murphy v. An Dang (Va. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 11× “She cited Code § 8.01-126’s requirement that a termination notice be admitted into evidence before 1 The record before this Court does not include the transcript from the motion hearing.”
Michael R. Agnew v. 1309 Taylors Point Road, LLC (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “It is well-established that the General Assembly has “confer[red] upon general district courts subject matter jurisdiction to try actions for unlawful detainer” under Code § 8.01-126. Id. at 50; see also Code § 8.”
Woodrock River Walk LLC v. Lloyd Rice (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “Code § 8.01-126. This summons “authorize[s] the removal of the tenant or other person in possession,” as opposed to mandating -5- the tenant to vacate upon service of the summons.”
Haring v. McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC (W.D. Va. 2024). · cites it 3× “See Va. Code § 8.01-126(e)(4) (providing that the former owner of a foreclosed upon property “shall be responsible for payment of fair market rental from the date of such foreclosure until the date the tenant vacates the dwelling unit, as well as damages, and for payment of…”
Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Harbin, 85 Va. Cir. 69 (Virginia Beach Cir. Ct. 2012). · cites it 4× “In this case, the unlawful detainer summons was filed in the General District Court according to the procedures provided in Virginia Code § 8.01-126. These provisions set the standard for judgment in an unlawful detainer case: “[i]f it appears .”
Epperson v. Smith (W.D. Va. 2022). · cites it 2× “This matter is before the court on Sheriff Smith’s motion for summary judgment on the Eppersons’ trespass claim (Count V).”
Wilson v. The Town of Mount Jackson (W.D. Va. 2022). “§ 8.01-126 on June 31, 2008, and the court has reviewed all nine past versions of the statute in addition to the operative version.”
Equitable Variable Life Ins. v. Advanced Corp. Servs., Inc., 33 Va. Cir. 95 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1993). · cites it 2× “01-127 is specifically applicable to cases “in which an action has commenced or a summons has been issued pursuant to § 8.01-126.” Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-127 (emphasis added).”
— Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-126(A) — 2 cases
Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 787 S.E.2d 116 (Va. 2016). “In the 156 years since Warwick and the 70 years since Addison, the General Assembly has amended the provision currently codified at Code § 8.01-126 several times. See, e.g., 1870-71 Acts ch.”
Destini Murphy v. An Dang (Va. Ct. App. 2022). “She cited Code § 8.01-126’s requirement that a termination notice be admitted into evidence before 1 The record before this Court does not include the transcript from the motion hearing.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-126(B) — 2 cases
Michael R. Agnew v. 1309 Taylors Point Road, LLC (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “It is well-established that the General Assembly has “confer[red] upon general district courts subject matter jurisdiction to try actions for unlawful detainer” under Code § 8.01-126. Id. at 50; see also Code § 8.”
Woodrock River Walk LLC v. Lloyd Rice (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “Code § 8.01-126. This summons “authorize[s] the removal of the tenant or other person in possession,” as opposed to mandating -5- the tenant to vacate upon service of the summons.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-126(E)(2)(a) — 1 case
Destini Murphy v. An Dang (Va. Ct. App. 2022). “She cited Code § 8.01-126’s requirement that a termination notice be admitted into evidence before 1 The record before this Court does not include the transcript from the motion hearing.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-126(e)(4) — 1 case
Haring v. McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC (W.D. Va. 2024). “See Va. Code § 8.01-126(e)(4) (providing that the former owner of a foreclosed upon property “shall be responsible for payment of fair market rental from the date of such foreclosure until the date the tenant vacates the dwelling unit, as well as damages, and for payment of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.