Except as prescribed in § 8.01-300 as to municipal and quasi-governmental corporations, and subject to § 8.01-286.1, process may be served on a domestic stock corporation, nonstock corporation, or limited liability company created by the laws of the Commonwealth as follows:
1. By personal service on any officer, director, or registered agent of any such corporation or on the registered agent of such limited liability company;
2. By substituted service on stock corporations in accordance with § 13.1-637, on nonstock corporations in accordance with § 13.1-836, and on limited liability companies in accordance with § 13.1-1018; or
3. If the address of the registered office of the corporation or limited liability company is a single-family residential dwelling, by substituted service on the registered agent of the corporation or limited liability company in the manner provided by subdivision 2 of § 8.01-296.
This section does not prescribe the only means, or necessarily the required means, of serving a domestic stock or nonstock corporation or limited liability company.
Code 1950, § 8-59; 1954, c. 23; 1956, c. 432; 1958, c. 13; 1976, c. 395; 1977, c. 617; 1991, c. 672; 2005, c. 866; 2016, c. 270; 2018, c. 475; 2024, c. 454.
Notes of Decisions
Fredericksburg Constr. Co. v. J.W. Wyne Excavating, Inc., 530 S.E.2d 148 (Va. 2000).
· cites it 14× “Fredericksburg further contended that, assuming it was not represented by counsel, service by first class mail on a principal of the corporation was insufficient under the provisions of Code § 8.01-299. Finally, Fredericksburg asserted that under the circumstances of this case…”
Frey v. Jefferson Homebuilders, Inc., 467 S.E.2d 788 (Va. 1996).
· cites it 12× “Code § 8.01-299 (emphasis added). Thus, Jefferson argues that it is within the emphasized exception of Code § 8.”
Khatchi v. Landmark Restaurant Assocs., Inc., 375 S.E.2d 743 (Va. 1989).
· cites it 4× “On appeal, as in the trial court, the defendant contends that the long-arm statute was designed to subject nonresidents, individuals who cannot be located, and foreign corporations to personal jurisdiction in a proper case, but that it was never intended to supplant Code §…”
Rice v. Alpha Sec., Inc., 940 F. Supp. 2d 321 (E.D. Va. 2013).
· cites it 7× “” Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-299(E)(1). The Virginia Code provides for further rules where a nonsuit occurs, stating in pertinent part that: If a plaintiff suffers a voluntary nonsuit as prescribed in § 8.”
Penn-Am. Ins. Co. v. White Pines, Inc., 387 F. Supp. 3d 646 (E.D. Va. 2019).
· cites it 2× “White Pines was properly served with the summons and Complaint under Virginia Code §§ 8.01-299(3) and 8.01-296(2) (b) as permitted under Fed.”
Michael Grecco Prods., Inc. v. Black Connections LLC, No. 3:23-cv-00516 (E.D. Va. May 17, 2024).
· cites it 21× “By personal service on any officer, director, or registered agent of such corporation or on the registered agent of such limited liability company; 2.”
Antonio Noah Lassiter v. Commonwealth, 620 S.E.2d 563 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
“01-296 or § 8.01-299. When issued by a magistrate it may be returned to and the case heard and determined by the judge of a general district court.”
Guerra v. Minx Holdings Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00375 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2025).
· cites it 5× “See Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299 (3). The executed service form itself confirms that posting the Summons and Complaint is proper only when serving an individual at a residence, not at a place of business.”
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(1): 2 cases
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(2): 1 case
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(3): 2 cases
Penn-Am. Ins. Co. v. White Pines, Inc., 387 F. Supp. 3d 646 (E.D. Va. 2019).
“White Pines was properly served with the summons and Complaint under Virginia Code §§ 8.01-299(3) and 8.01-296(2) (b) as permitted under Fed.”
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(D): 2 cases
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(E)(1): 1 case
Rice v. Alpha Sec., Inc., 940 F. Supp. 2d 321 (E.D. Va. 2013).
“” Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-299(E)(1). The Virginia Code provides for further rules where a nonsuit occurs, stating in pertinent part that: If a plaintiff suffers a voluntary nonsuit as prescribed in § 8.”
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-299(E)(3): 2 cases
Rice v. Alpha Sec., Inc., 940 F. Supp. 2d 321 (E.D. Va. 2013).
“” Va.Code Ann. § 8.01-299(E)(1). The Virginia Code provides for further rules where a nonsuit occurs, stating in pertinent part that: If a plaintiff suffers a voluntary nonsuit as prescribed in § 8.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.