State v. Olson, 226 P. 1026 (Wash. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Olson, 226 P. 1026 (Wash. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of Washington
v.
Thomas Olson
No. 18187.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jun 30, 1924.
226 P. 1026
Fred M. Bond, for appellants., John I. O’Phelan and A. D. Gillies, for respondent.
Pemberton.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Rehearing

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Baño, a majority of the court adhere to the views expressed in the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 127 Wash. 300, 220 Pac. 776. Therefore the judgment, modified as in that opinion indicated, is affirmed. The appellants will recover their costs here.

Dissent

Pemberton, J.

(dissenting) — I concur in the views expressed by Judge Tolman in his dissenting opinion, and therefore dissent.