Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 10.10.010 (2026)
Court rules
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Every person convicted before a district judge of any offense may appeal from the judgment as provided by court rules.
[ 1987 c 202 s 156; 1891 c 29 s 6, part; RRS s 1919, part. Prior: Code 1881 s 1898, part; 1877 p 203 s 7, part; 1873 p 384 s 196, part; 1854 p 261 s 177. Formerly RCW 10.10.010, 10.10.020, and 10.10.030.]
Notes:
Intent—1987 c 202: See note following RCW 2.04.190.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1961–1990 · leading case: In Re Borchert, 359 P.2d 789 (Wash. 1961).
In Re Borchert, 359 P.2d 789 (Wash. 1961). “RCW 10.10.010. Legislation establishing fee justice courts in other jurisdictions, which contains only a portion of our legislative safeguards against possible bias or prejudice, has been upheld in the following jurisdictions: Hill v.”
State v. Hastings, 793 P.2d 956 (Wash. 1990). “2; RCW 10.10.010. On appeal, the defendant argued that the District Court judge lacked personal jurisdiction because he, the defendant, did not expressly consent to the authority of the judge pro tempore.”
State v. Ladiges, 386 P.2d 416 (Wash. 1963). “RCW 10.10.010 provides: “Every person convicted before a justice of the peace of any offense may appeal from the judgment, within ten days thereafter, to the superior court.”
State v. Cascade Dist. Court, 603 P.2d 1264 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “In contrast, RCW 10.10.010 provides only that "[ejvery person convicted before a justice of the peace of any offense may appeal from the judgment, within ten days thereafter, to the superior court.”
State v. Cook, 512 P.2d 744 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973). “Nevertheless, under APR 9D (3) a legal intern, although under the direction of the supervising attorney, was permitted to appear without the presence of his supervising attorney in "cases tried in a trial court from the judgment of which there is a right of trial de novo on…”
State v. Beck, 598 P.2d 400 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “Beck's sole contention is that his appeal from district court should not have been dismissed because he returned to the jurisdiction of the court before the motion to dismiss was heard.”
State v. Holland, 501 P.2d 1243 (Wash. Ct. App. 1972). “Pursuant to RCW 10.10.010, an appeal bond in the amount of $100 was set.”
State v. West, 358 P.2d 955 (Wash. 1961). “” The statutory provisions referred to in the last sentence of the foregoing quotation are contained in RCW 10.10.010, which prescribes the following procedure in regard to appeals from justice courts: “Every person convicted before a justice of the peace of any offense may…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.