Wash. Rev. Code » Title 10 · Chapter 10.19
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 10.19.105 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If a bond be given and execution stayed, as provided in RCW 10.19.100, and the person for whose appearance such recognizance was given shall be produced in court before the expiration of said period of sixty days, the judge may vacate such judgment upon such terms as may be just and equitable, otherwise execution shall forthwith issue as well against the sureties in the new bond as against the judgment debtors.
[ 1891 c 28 s 87; Code 1881 s 1139; 1867 p 103 s 3; RRS s 2233. Formerly RCW 10.19.100, part.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2021 · leading case: State v. Kramer, 167 Wash. 2d 548 (Wash. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kramer, 167 Wash. 2d 548 (Wash. 2009). · cites it 27× “¶1 This case involves a trial court’s discretion to refuse to vacate a default judgment of forfeiture against a surety when the defendant has been returned to custody within the 60 days provided by RCW 10.19.105. This court has long held that bondsmen are entitled to exoneration…”
State v. Kramer, 219 P.3d 700 (Wash. 2009). · cites it 28× “¶ 1 This case involves a trial court's discretion to refuse to vacate a default judgment of forfeiture against a surety when the defendant has been returned to custody within the 60 days provided by RCW 10.19.105. This court has long held that bondsmen are entitled to…”
State v. Hampton, 728 P.2d 1049 (Wash. 1986). · cites it 2× “To hold otherwise would discourage the giving of hail and defeat the manifest purpose of the statute [now codified as RCW 10.19.105]. State v. Jackschitz, 76 Wash.”
State v. Mullen, 401 P.2d 991 (Wash. 1965). · cites it 4× “100 and RCW 10.19.105. RCW 10.19.100 provides: The parties, or either of them, against whom such judgment may be entered in the superior or supreme courts, may stay said execution for sixty days by giving a bond with two or more sureties, to be approved by the clerk, conditioned…”
State v. Hampton, 709 P.2d 1221 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 3× “100, and the person for whose appearance such recognizance was given shall be produced in court before the expiration of said period of sixty days, the judge may vacate such judgment upon such terms as may be just and equitable, otherwise execution shall forthwith issue as well…”
State v. Ringrose, 426 P.2d 848 (Wash. 1967). · cites it 8× “100 and RCW 10.19.105, which read as follows: The parties, or either of them, against whom such judgment may be entered in the superior or supreme courts, may stay said execution for sixty days by giving a bond with two or more sureties, to be approved by the clerk, conditioned…”
State v. Molina, 507 P.2d 909 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973). “” 2 RCW 10.19.105 provides for vacation of a forfeiture judgment as follows: “If a bond be given and execution stayed, as provided in RCW 10.”
State Of Washington v. Sarah Marie Strong (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “RCW 10.19.105; State v. Kramer, 167 Wn.2d 548, 555-56 , 219 P.”
State Of Washington v. Pac. Nw. Bail Bonding (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “The bail bond statutes provide a framework for the trial court to determine whether a case warrants a decision based in equity. RCW 10.19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.