Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 10.73.130 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[ 1989 c 395 s 6.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1990–2014 · leading case: Matter of Pers. Restraint of Runyan, 853 P.2d 424 (Wash. 2000).
Matter of Pers. Restraint of Runyan, 853 P.2d 424 (Wash. 2000). “Broad exceptions are given for newly discovered evidence, convictions under unconstitutional statutes, convictions barred by double jeopardy, convictions obtained with insufficient evidence, sentences in excess of the court's jurisdiction, or significant changes in the law which…”
In Re the Pers. Restraint of Cook, 792 P.2d 506 (Wash. 1990). “Cook's petition was filed before this legislation takes effect, see RCW 10.73.130, those statutory limitations are not applicable here.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Stockwell, 316 P.3d 1007 (Wash. 2014). “RCW 10.73.130. The Department of Corrections (DOC) was directed to attempt to advise every person who, on the effective date, was “serving a term of incarceration, probation, parole, or community supervision pursuant to a conviction of a felony,” of the change.”
State v. Landon, 848 P.2d 724 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993). “RCW 10.73.130 provides that RCW 10.73.090 and RCW 10.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Stenson, 76 P.3d 241 (Wash. 2003). “Agent Errera’s testimony is not at issue in this petition and Stenson is not claiming that the blood on his pants was not Hoemer’s blood.”
State v. King, 925 P.2d 606 (Wash. 1996). “RCW 10.73.130. Here, King raised his first challenge to his guilty pleas in February 1992, which is more than one year after July 23, 1989.”
In re the Pers. Restraint Well, 133 Wash. 2d 433 (Wash. 1997). “RCW 10.73.130 states: "RCW 10.73.090 and 10.”
Matter of Well, 946 P.2d 750 (Wash. 1997). “RCW 10.73.130 states: "RCW 10.73.090 and 10.”
State v. Carney, 178 Wash. App. 349 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “*357 ¶22 Under RCW 10.73.130, the one-year time bar applies only to a collateral attack filed more than one year after July 23, 1989.”
In Re Stenson, 76 P.3d 241 (Wash. 2003). “[2] RCW 10.73.130 merely provides that RCW 10.”
State v. King, 925 P.2d 606 (Wash. 1996). “ion based on one or more of the following grounds: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) the statute that the defendant was convicted of violating is unconstitutional; (3) the conviction is barred by double jeopardy; (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the defendant's…”
State Of Washington v. William Carney (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “68168-1-1/7 Under RCW 10.73.130, the one-year time bar applies only to a collateral attack filed more than one year after July 23, 1989.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.