Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 10.93.100 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Federal peace officers shall have no additional powers by virtue of this chapter but shall be limited to those powers already vested by law or hereafter created by separate enactment.
[ 1985 c 89 s 10.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: In re Pers. Restraint of Frazier, 558 P.3d 451 (Wash. 2024).
In re Pers. Restraint of Frazier, 558 P.3d 451 (Wash. 2024). “” The “commonly held theories” that pervaded Frazier’s sentence wrongly increased his perceived dangerousness, incorrigibility, and culpability. Dr. Stanfill’s evaluation of Frazier rebutted those misconceptions and stereotypes.”
State v. Barker, 990 P.2d 438 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “5 RCW 10.93.100; RCW 10.93.020(6). 6 State v.”
Pers. Restraint Petition Of Alejandro Garcia Mendoza (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “090(1) states that "No petition or motion for collateral attack on a judgment and sentence in a criminal case may be filed more than one year after the judgment becomes final if the judgment and sentence is valid on its face and was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 10.93.100(1) — 1 case
In re Pers. Restraint of Frazier, 558 P.3d 451 (Wash. 2024). “” The “commonly held theories” that pervaded Frazier’s sentence wrongly increased his perceived dangerousness, incorrigibility, and culpability. Dr. Stanfill’s evaluation of Frazier rebutted those misconceptions and stereotypes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.