Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 11.106.060 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon or before the return date any beneficiary of the trust may file the beneficiary's written objections or exceptions to the account filed or to any action of the trustee or trustees set forth in the account. The court shall appoint guardians ad litem as provided in RCW 11.96A.160 and the court may allow representatives to be appointed under RCW 11.96A.120 or 11.96A.250 to represent the persons listed in those sections.
[ 1999 c 42 s 629; 1985 c 30 s 100. Prior: 1984 c 149 s 133; 1977 ex.s. c 80 s 31; 1955 c 33 s 30.30.060; prior: 1951 c 226 s 6. Formerly RCW 30.30.060.]
Notes:
Effective date—1999 c 42: See RCW 11.96A.902.
Severability—Effective dates—1984 c 149: See notes following RCW 11.02.005.
Purpose—Intent—Severability—1977 ex.s. c 80: See notes following RCW 4.16.190.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2013–2020 · leading case: Anderson v. Dussault, 333 P.3d 395 (Wash. 2014).
Anderson v. Dussault, 333 P.3d 395 (Wash. 2014). “” RCW 11.106.060. Further, RCW 11.96A-.160 is a TEDRA provision that outlines procedures for the discretionary appointment of guardians ad litem.”
Anderson v. Dussault, 310 P.3d 854 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “¶26 RCW 11.106.060 states that when a trustee seeks court approval of an intermediate accounting, “[t]he court shall appoint guardians ad litem as provided in RCW 11.”
Anderson v. Dussault (Wash. 2014). “" RCW 11.106.060. Further, RCW 11.96A.l60 is a TEDRA provision that outlines procedures for the discretionary appointment of guardians ad litem.”
In Re: Gust Rakus Credit Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “8 RCW 11.106.060. 5 No. 79566-0-I/6 propriety of all actions of the trustee or trustees set forth in the account including the purchase, retention, and disposition of any of the property and funds of the trust, and shall render its decree either approving or disapproving the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.