Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 11.48.020 (2026)
Right to possession and management of estate
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2445.SL) ***
Every personal representative shall, after having qualified, by giving bond as hereinbefore provided, have a right to the immediate possession of all the real as well as personal estate of the deceased, and may receive the rents and profits of the real estate until the estate shall be settled or delivered over, by order of the court, to the heirs or devisees, and shall keep in tenantable repair all houses, buildings and fixtures thereon, which are under his or her control.
[ 2010 c 8 s 2030; 1965 c 145 s 11.48.020. Prior: 1917 c 156 s 94; RRS s 1464; prior: Code 1881 s 1444; 1860 p 189 s 132; 1854 p 278 s 65.]
Notes:
When title vests: RCW 11.04.250.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1952–2018 · leading case: Jones v. Jones, 152 Wash. 2d 1 (Wash. 2004).
Jones v. Jones, 152 Wash. 2d 1 (Wash. 2004). “RCW 11.48.020; Bishop v. Locke, 92 Wash. 90, 92 , 158 P.”
In Re Est. of Jones, 93 P.3d 147 (Wash. 2004). “RCW 11.48.020; Bishop v. Locke, 92 Wash. 90, 92 , 158 P.”
In re the Est. of Wimberley, 349 P.3d 11 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “RCW 11.48.020. However, when a person’s right to possession of the property arises from his status as executor, he does not have a right to use the property when there are other reasonable alternatives open, such as renting the property.”
In Re Hickman's Est., 250 P.2d 524 (Wash. 1952). “The object of paragraph X is obscure, but, if it was intended thereby that possession of the property should be delivered to respondent forthwith, this provision is premature.”
In Re Est. of Boston, 491 P.2d 1033 (Wash. 1971). “Appellant argues that as executor he had a duty to retain possession of the estate under RCW 11.48.020 and .030, and further, that it was expedient for him to remain there to protect it from vandalism and decay.”
Hatfield v. Steinhoff, 730 P.2d 696 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986). “300; RCW 11.48.020. Consequently, the contention fails.”
Larson v. Duclos, 281 P.2d 458 (Wash. 1955). “Our statute (RCW 11.48.020) provides: “Every . . . administrator shall .”
In re Westall, 423 P.3d 930 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 30 RCW 11.48.020 grants a personal representative the right to immediate possession of all real and personal property of the deceased.”
Davenport v. Elliott Bay Plywood MacHines Co., 632 P.2d 76 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). “RCW 11.48.020. His right to possession and control of all of the estate property, including the stock, is well settled.”
Washington Escrow Co. v. Blair, 243 P.2d 1044 (Wash. 1952). “Respondent McKinnon urges that, because he is the executor of his father’s will, he is, as executor, under the provisions of RCW 11.48.020 (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1464), entitled to possession of the fund during administration of the estate.”
Est. Of Doris Mathews (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “5 Because we determine that a quasi-fiduciary relationship arose between Spice and the Estate regarding the co-owned property as a consequence of the various court orders, we do not reach the question of whether co-tenants are necessarily in a fiduciary relationship or otherwise…”
Est. Of Sandra Westall (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “RCW 11.48.020 grants a personal representative the right to immediate possession of all real and personal property of the deceased.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.