Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) If a claimant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets will not be provided from other resources and that an increased award would not be inconsistent with the decedent's intentions or principles of equity and fairness, the amount of the award may be increased above the amount of the basic award in an amount that the court determines to be needed for a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets.
(2) In determining the needs of the claimant, the court shall consider, without limitation, the resources available to the claimant and the claimant's dependent children, and the resources reasonably expected to be available to the claimant and the claimant's dependent children during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets, including income related to present or future employment and benefits flowing from the decedent's probate and nonprobate estate.
(3) In determining the intentions of the decedent, the court shall consider, without limitation:
(a) Provisions made for the claimant by the decedent under the terms of the decedent's will or otherwise;
(b) Provisions made for third parties or other entities under the decedent's will or otherwise that would be affected by an increased award;
(c) If the claimant is the surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner, the duration and status of the marriage or the state registered domestic partnership of the decedent to the claimant at the time of the decedent's death;
(d) The effect of any award on the availability of any other resources or benefits to the claimant;
(e) The size and nature of the decedent's probate and nonprobate estate; and
(f) Oral or written statements made by the decedent that are otherwise admissible as evidence.
The fact that the decedent has named beneficiaries other than the claimant as recipients of the decedent's estate is not of itself adequate to evidence such an intent as would prevent the award of an amount in excess of the basic award that is provided in RCW 11.54.020(1).
(4)(a) The court may only grant an increased award if a petition for a basic award has been granted under RCW 11.54.010. The request for an increased award may be made in conjunction with the petition for an award under RCW 11.54.010.
(b) Subject to (a) of this subsection (4), a request for an increased award may be made at any time during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets. A request to modify an increased award may also be made at any time during the pendency of the probate proceedings by a person having an interest in the decedent's estate that will be directly affected by the requested modification.
[ 2024 c 20 s 7; 2008 c 6 s 919; 1997 c 252 s 51.]

Notes:

Effective dateSavings2024 c 20: See notes following RCW 11.54.001.
Part headings not lawSeverability2008 c 6: See RCW 26.60.900 and 26.60.901.
Application1997 c 252 ss 1-73: See note following RCW 11.02.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: Carlton v. Black, 153 Wash. 2d 152 (Wash. 2004).
Carlton v. Black, 153 Wash. 2d 152 (Wash. 2004). “040(2) (same for notice agent handling creditors against nonprobate assets); RCW 11.54.040(1) (standard of proof to obtain increased award from estate for basic maintenance and support needs); RCW 11.”
In Re Est. of Black, 102 P.3d 796 (Wash. 2004). “040(2) (same for notice agent handling creditors against nonprobate assets); RCW 11.54.040(1) (standard of proof to obtain increased award from estate for basic maintenance and support needs); RCW 11.”
In re the Est. of Garwood, 109 Wash. App. 811 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). “030(2) and either increased or decreased according to RCW 11.54.040 and .050. A family allowance had no monetary limit and traditionally could be awarded in addition to homestead.”
In Re Est. of Garwood, 38 P.3d 362 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). “030(2) and either increased or decreased according to RCW 11.54.040 and 050. A family allowance had no monetary limit and traditionally could be awarded in addition to homestead.”
In the Matter of the Est. Of: Marilyn Sue Hein (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 15× “But the standard the trial court was persuaded to employ applies only to RCW 11.54.040, which authorizes a need-based increase to the basic award, not the 2 No.”
In Re Lada S. Mnatsakanova (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “Under RCW 11.54.040(3)(b), the court has discretion to set the value of the family support award, including considering the impact it would have on provisions made for third parties under the decedent’s will.”
Matter Of The Est. Of: Larry Dean Niggli (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “84825-9-I/8 the preceding calendar year. RCW 6.13.030. However, the statutes addressing awards for the support of surviving family members provide factors that a trial court may consider in increasing or decreasing the amount of the award.”
Est. Of Carole Stevenson Christian (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “Lowell next contends that the trial court erred in refusing to award him the community property in Carole's estate. Lowell argues that $29,000 in proceeds from Sara Lee Corporation stock that was purchased with marital funds in 1968 is community property.”
In Re Est. Of: Vernon D. Hannah (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “" On April 11, Bernell filed a "Petition for an Order Increasing the Award in Lieu of Homestead and Declaration in Support (Pursuant to RCW 11.54.040(4)(a))" in the probate proceeding; San Juan County Superior Court Cause Number 12-4-05075-7.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040(1) — 3 cases
Carlton v. Black, 153 Wash. 2d 152 (Wash. 2004). “040(2) (same for notice agent handling creditors against nonprobate assets); RCW 11.54.040(1) (standard of proof to obtain increased award from estate for basic maintenance and support needs); RCW 11.”
In Re Est. of Black, 102 P.3d 796 (Wash. 2004). “040(2) (same for notice agent handling creditors against nonprobate assets); RCW 11.54.040(1) (standard of proof to obtain increased award from estate for basic maintenance and support needs); RCW 11.”
In the Matter of the Est. Of: Marilyn Sue Hein (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “But the standard the trial court was persuaded to employ applies only to RCW 11.54.040, which authorizes a need-based increase to the basic award, not the 2 No.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040(2) — 1 case
In the Matter of the Est. Of: Marilyn Sue Hein (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “But the standard the trial court was persuaded to employ applies only to RCW 11.54.040, which authorizes a need-based increase to the basic award, not the 2 No.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040(3) — 2 cases
In the Matter of the Est. Of: Marilyn Sue Hein (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “But the standard the trial court was persuaded to employ applies only to RCW 11.54.040, which authorizes a need-based increase to the basic award, not the 2 No.”
Est. Of Carole Stevenson Christian (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “Lowell next contends that the trial court erred in refusing to award him the community property in Carole's estate. Lowell argues that $29,000 in proceeds from Sara Lee Corporation stock that was purchased with marital funds in 1968 is community property.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040(3)(b) — 1 case
In Re Lada S. Mnatsakanova (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Under RCW 11.54.040(3)(b), the court has discretion to set the value of the family support award, including considering the impact it would have on provisions made for third parties under the decedent’s will.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.54.040(4)(a) — 1 case
In Re Est. Of: Vernon D. Hannah (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “" On April 11, Bernell filed a "Petition for an Order Increasing the Award in Lieu of Homestead and Declaration in Support (Pursuant to RCW 11.54.040(4)(a))" in the probate proceeding; San Juan County Superior Court Cause Number 12-4-05075-7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.