Wash. Rev. Code » Title 14 · Chapter 14.08
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 14.08.010 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) For the purpose of this chapter, unless herein specifically otherwise provided, the definitions of words, terms and phrases appearing in the state aeronautic department act of this state are hereby adopted.
(2) As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: "Municipality" means any county, city, town, airport district, or port district of this state; "airport purposes" means and includes airport, restricted landing area and other air navigation facility purposes.
[ 1987 c 254 s 3; 1945 c 182 s 1; Rem. Supp. 1945 s 2722-30.]

Notes:

Reviser's note: The state aeronautic department act (chapter 252, Laws of 1945) contained no definitions. It was repealed by chapter 165, Laws of 1947, codified herein as chapter 47.68 RCW.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1955–2004 · leading case: Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co., 355 P.2d 781 (Wash. 1960).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co., 355 P.2d 781 (Wash. 1960). · cites it 4× “) "Airport hazard," as defined by RCW 14.08.010(1) by reference to RCW 14.04.”
Branson v. Port of Seattle, 152 Wash. 2d 862 (Wash. 2004). “See RCW 14.08.010, .120. As a result Branson, and other similarly situated travelers forced to pay the Port’s fee, cannot sue the rental car companies directly for allegedly violating the statute.”
Branson v. Port of Seattle, 101 P.3d 67 (Wash. 2004). “See RCW 14.08.010; RCW 14.08.120. As a result Branson, and other similarly situated travelers forced to pay the Port's fee, cannot sue the rental car companies directly for allegedly violating the statute.”
Port of Olympia v. Deschutes Animal Clinic, Inc., 576 P.2d 899 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978). “…nor is it an issue on appeal. 2 A port authority is considered to be a municipality for the purposes of RCW 14.08. RCW 14.08.010.”
Roberts v. Port of Seattle, 282 P.2d 821 (Wash. 1955). “There is no question that the port of Seattle has a right to condemn private property for the extension of the runways of the Seattle-Tacoma Airport. Section 2, chapter 166, Laws of 1943, p.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 14.08.010(1) — 1 case
Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co., 355 P.2d 781 (Wash. 1960). “) "Airport hazard," as defined by RCW 14.08.010(1) by reference to RCW 14.04.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 14.08.010(2) — 1 case
Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co., 355 P.2d 781 (Wash. 1960). “) "Airport hazard," as defined by RCW 14.08.010(1) by reference to RCW 14.04.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.