Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 15.49.071 (2026)
Damages—Mediation prerequisite to legal action
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) When a buyer is damaged by the failure of any seed covered by this chapter to produce or perform as represented by the required label, by warranty, or as a result of negligence, the buyer, as a prerequisite to maintaining a legal action against the dealer of such seed, shall have first provided for the mediation of the claim. Any statutory period of limitations with respect to such claim shall be tolled from the date mediation proceedings are instituted until ten days after the date on which the mediation proceedings are concluded. Mediation proceedings are instituted from the date the buyer mails the dealer the buyer's complaint with its request to engage in mediation as provided under RCW 15.49.091.
(2) Conspicuous language calling attention to the requirement for mediation under this section shall be referenced or included on the analysis label required under this chapter.
(3) This section applies only to claims, or counterclaims, where the relief sought is, or includes, a monetary amount in excess of five thousand dollars. All claims for five thousand dollars or less may be commenced in either district court or small claims court.
(4) The mediation provisions under this section apply only to a dealer subject to this state's jurisdiction in relation to the buyer's claims.
Notes:
Effective date—1989 c 354 ss 70-81 and 84-86: See note following RCW 15.49.005.
Severability—1989 c 354: See note following RCW 15.36.012.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. Delanoy, 114 P.3d 692 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005).
Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. Delanoy, 114 P.3d 692 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 15.49.071; WAC 16-301-015(2). But chapter 15.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 15.49.071(1) — 1 case
Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. Delanoy, 114 P.3d 692 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 15.49.071; WAC 16-301-015(2). But chapter 15.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.