Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.130.060 (2026)

Violations—Application of consumer protection act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Violation of this chapter constitutes a violation of chapter 19.86 RCW, the consumer protection act. It shall be presumed that damages to the consumer are equal to the purchase price of any telephone equipment sold in violation of this chapter up to one hundred dollars. Additional damages must be proved.
[ 1984 c 275 s 7.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2013 · leading case: State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (Wash. 1985).
State v. Schwab, 693 P.2d 108 (Wash. 1985). · cites it 2× “340. [4] RCW 19.102.020. [5] RCW 19.52.036. [6] RCW 19.”
Nat'l Elec. Contractors Ass'n v. Riveland, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1322 (Wash. 1999). “The Legislature has *38 declared violations of numerous business regulations actionable under the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.”
Gragg v. Orange Cab Co., 942 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (W.D. Wash. 2013). “”); RCW 19.130.060 (‘Wiolation of this chapter constitutes a *1118 violation of chapter 19.”
Anderson v. Valley Quality Homes, Inc., 928 P.2d 1143 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “041, Washington’s lemon law, provides in subsection (3) "a violation of any responsibilities imposed upon dealers under this chapter is a per se violation of [the CPA]”; RCW 19.130.060 provides "Violation of this chapter [telephone buyers’ protection act] constitutes a violation…”
Nat'l Elec. Contractors v. Riveland, 978 P.2d 481 (Wash. 1999). “The Legislature has declared violations of numerous business regulations actionable under the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.