Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 19.182.005 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature finds and declares that consumers have a vital interest in establishing and maintaining creditworthiness. The legislature further finds that an elaborate mechanism using credit reports has developed for investigating and evaluating a consumer's creditworthiness, credit capacity, and general reputation and character. As such, credit reports are used for evaluating credit card, loan, mortgage, and small business financing applications, as well as for decisions regarding employment and the rental or leasing of dwellings. Moreover, financial institutions and other creditors depend upon fair and accurate credit reports to efficiently and accurately evaluate creditworthiness. Unfair or inaccurate reports undermine both public and creditor confidences in the reliability of credit granting systems.
Therefore, this chapter is necessary to assure accurate credit data collection, maintenance, and reporting on the citizens of the state. It is the policy of the state that credit reporting agencies maintain accurate credit reports, resolve disputed reports promptly and fairly, and adopt reasonable procedures to promote consumer confidentiality and the proper use of credit data in accordance with this chapter.
[ 1993 c 476 s 1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: Handlin v. On-Site Manager, Inc., 351 P.3d 226 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
Handlin v. On-Site Manager, Inc., 351 P.3d 226 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “See RCW 19.182.005 (legislature declares “that consumers have a vital interest in establishing and maintaining creditworthiness”).”
Jones-Adams v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC (W.D. Wash. 2025). “§ 1681 with RCW 19.182.005). Under federal and state law, 15 a plaintiff must show there was a credit report with inaccurate information.”
Brian & Karen Handlin v. On-site Manager, Inc. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “See RCW 19.182.005 (legislature declares "that consumers have a vital interest in establishing and maintaining creditworthiness.”
Van Hoven v. Pre-Emp..com, Inc., 156 Wash. App. 879 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Van Hoven’s argument is not persuasive. By signing the background authorization form, Mr.”
Van Hoven v. Pre-Emp.. Com, Inc., 234 P.3d 1183 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Van Hoven's argument is not persuasive. By signing the background authorization form, Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.