Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.30
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.020 (2026)

License required—Duplicates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No person shall act as a farm labor contractor until a license to do so has been issued to him or her by the director, and unless such license is in full force and effect and is in the contractor's possession. The director shall, by regulation, provide a means of issuing duplicate licenses in case of loss of the original license or any other appropriate instances. The director shall issue, on a monthly basis, a list of currently licensed farm labor contractors.
[ 1985 c 280 s 2; 1955 c 392 s 2.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2013 · leading case: Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). · cites it 3× “The proposed class is pursuing four separate claims for statutory damages: (1) failure to obtain a farm labor contractor license in violation of RCW 19.30.020 and .110(1); (2) failure to provide written disclosures concerning terms and conditions of employment in violation of…”
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993). “§ 1811 , RCW 19.30.020. Under the AWPA, a “farm labor contractor” is defined as: any person, other than an agricultural employer, an agricultural association, or an employee of an agricultural employer or agricultural association, who, for any money or other consideration paid…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.020(1) — 1 case
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “The proposed class is pursuing four separate claims for statutory damages: (1) failure to obtain a farm labor contractor license in violation of RCW 19.30.020 and .110(1); (2) failure to provide written disclosures concerning terms and conditions of employment in violation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.