Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.30
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.120 (2026)

Farm labor contractor—Prohibited acts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No person acting as a farm labor contractor shall:
(1) Make any misrepresentation or false statement in an application for a license.
(2) Make or cause to be made, to any person, any false, fraudulent, or misleading representation, or publish or circulate or cause to be published or circulated any false, fraudulent, or misleading information concerning the terms or conditions or existence of employment at any place or places, or by any person or persons, or of any individual or individuals.
(3) Send or transport any worker to any place where the farm labor contractor knows a strike or lockout exists.
(4) Do any act in the capacity of a farm labor contractor, or cause any act to be done, which constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude under any law of the state of Washington.
[ 1985 c 280 s 10; 1955 c 392 s 12.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2013–2022 · leading case: Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). · cites it 7× “§ 1831 (e) and RCW 19.30.120(2); and (4) unlawful intimidation of putative class members by a NW Management supervisor in violation RCW 19.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). · cites it 4× “180(3)), a breach of contract claim, FLCA claims (a single count alleging 12 violations of Wash. Rev. Code §§ 19.30.120 (2), 19.30.110(5), 19.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). · cites it 2× “11 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint brings FLCA claims under 12 Washington Revised Code Sections 19.30.120(2), 19.30.110(5), 19.30.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.120(2). 19 Id. at 35-38 , ¶ C. On June 2, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ FLCA claim 20 under RCW 19.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.120(2) — 4 cases
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “§ 1831 (e) and RCW 19.30.120(2); and (4) unlawful intimidation of putative class members by a NW Management supervisor in violation RCW 19.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “11 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint brings FLCA claims under 12 Washington Revised Code Sections 19.30.120(2), 19.30.110(5), 19.30.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “180(3)), a breach of contract claim, FLCA claims (a single count alleging 12 violations of Wash. Rev. Code §§ 19.30.120 (2), 19.30.110(5), 19.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.120(2). 19 Id. at 35-38 , ¶ C. On June 2, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ FLCA claim 20 under RCW 19.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.120(4) — 1 case
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “§ 1831 (e) and RCW 19.30.120(2); and (4) unlawful intimidation of putative class members by a NW Management supervisor in violation RCW 19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.