Wash. Rev. Code » Title 2 · Chapter 2.48
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 2.48.130 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The annual membership fees for active members shall be payable on or before February 1st of each year. The board of governors may establish the amount of such annual membership fee to be effective each year: PROVIDED, That written notice of any proposed increase in membership fee shall be sent to active members not less than sixty days prior to the effective date of such increase: PROVIDED FURTHER, That the board of governors may establish the fee at a reduced rate for those who have been active members for less than five years in this state or elsewhere.
[ 1957 c 138 s 1; 1953 c 256 s 1; 1933 c 94 s 9; RRS s 138-9.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1972–2012 · leading case: Graham v. Bar Ass'n, 548 P.2d 310 (Wash. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Graham v. Bar Ass'n, 548 P.2d 310 (Wash. 1976). · cites it 4× “060) and prescribes the amount of the license fee (RCW 2.48.130). [3] In In re Bruen, 102 Wash.”
State Ex Rel. Schwab v. Washington State Bar Ass'n, 493 P.2d 1237 (Wash. 1972). · cites it 2× “RCW 2.48.130. It is agreed that the state bar *268 association sent petitioner the statutory notices informing him his membership fee was delinquent.”
In Re the Marriage of Dalthorp, 598 P.2d 788 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “RCW 2.48.130 and .140. RCW 2.48.170 does provide that only an active member of the bar may practice law, but it does not require one who has been admitted to practice and is an active member of the bar at the time of his appointment as a commissioner to continue an active…”
State v. Janda, 298 P.3d 751 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 2.48.130 provides for bar membership fees for “active members,” and RCW 2.”
State Of Washington v. Steven Andrew Janda (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “unless he or she shall be an active member" of the state bar.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.