Wash. Rev. Code » Title 2 · Chapter 2.56
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 2.56.190 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2178-S.SL) ***
By October 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the administrative office of the courts shall distribute such funds to counties for county clerk collection budgets as are appropriated by the legislature for this purpose, using the funding formula recommended by the Washington association of county officials. The administrative office of the courts shall not deduct any amount for indirect or direct costs, and shall distribute the entire amount appropriated by the legislature to the counties for county clerk collection budgets. The administrative office of the courts shall report on the amounts distributed to counties to the appropriate committees of the legislature no later than December 1, 2003, and annually thereafter.
The administrative office of the courts may expend for the purposes of billing for legal financial obligations, such funds as are appropriated for the legislature for this purpose.
[ 2003 c 379 s 21.]

Notes:

Severability—Effective dates—2003 c 379: See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Intent—Purpose—2003 c 379 ss 13-27: See note following RCW 9.94A.760.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: West v. Washington Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 162 Wash. App. 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
West v. Washington Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 162 Wash. App. 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “RCW 2.56.190; RCW 36.23.110; RCW 36.28.170; RCW 36.”
West v. State, Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 252 P.3d 406 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “RCW 2.56.190; RCW 36.23.110; RCW 36.28.170; RCW 36.”
In Re Martin, 118 P.3d 387 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “110; RCW 2.56.190). See Laws of 2003 ch. 379 §§ 13-27.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Martin, 129 Wash. App. 135 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “110; RCW 2.56.190). See Laws of 2003 ch. 379 §§ 13-27.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.