Wash. Rev. Code » Title 23 · Chapter 23.95
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 23.95.400 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The definitions in this section apply throughout this section and RCW 23.95.405 through 23.95.460 unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(1) "Registered agent filing" means:
(a) The public organic record of a domestic entity;
(b) An application of a domestic limited liability partnership; or
(c) A registration statement filed pursuant to RCW 23.95.510.
(3) [(2)] "Represented entity" means:
(a) A domestic entity; or
(b) A registered foreign entity.
[ 2015 c 176 s 1401.]

Notes:

Effective date—Contingent effective date—2015 c 176: See note following RCW 23.95.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Keller v. Mountlake Terrace Code Enf't (W.D. Wash. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Symon Mandawala v. Era Living Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “” RCW 23.95.400(3)(a)-(b). “‘Domestic,’ with respect to an entity, means governed as to its internal affairs by the law of this state.”
Russell v. WADOT Capital Inc (W.D. Wash. 2023). “Therefore, the 3 court holds that Ms. Russell has not yet effected service on NCP.”
Keller v. Mountlake Terrace Code Enf't (W.D. Wash. 2025). “080(8) (2025) 22 (citing RCW 23.95.400, 450). 1 Plaintiffs’ failure to oppose the motion an admission that that the motion has merit— 2 particularly here, where it is Plaintiffs’ burden to prove that service was valid.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 23.95.400(2)(a) — 1 case
Russell v. WADOT Capital Inc (W.D. Wash. 2023). “Therefore, the 3 court holds that Ms. Russell has not yet effected service on NCP.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 23.95.400(3)(a) — 1 case
Symon Mandawala v. Era Living Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “” RCW 23.95.400(3)(a)-(b). “‘Domestic,’ with respect to an entity, means governed as to its internal affairs by the law of this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.