Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 26.52.005 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The problem of women fleeing across state lines to escape their abusers is epidemic in the United States. In 1994, Congress enacted the violence against women act (VAWA) as Title IV of the violent crime control and law enforcement act (P.L. 103-322). The VAWA provides for improved prevention and prosecution of violent crimes against women and children. Section 2265 of the VAWA (Title IV, P.L. 103-322) provides for nationwide enforcement of civil and criminal protection orders in state and tribal courts throughout the country.
The legislature finds that existing statutes may not provide an adequate mechanism for victims, police, prosecutors, and courts to enforce a foreign protection order in our state. It is the intent of the legislature that the barriers faced by persons entitled to protection under a foreign protection order will be removed and that violations of foreign protection orders be criminally prosecuted in this state.
[ 1999 c 184 s 2.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2006–2008 · leading case: Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., Inc., 193 P.3d 128 (Wash. 2008).
Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., Inc., 193 P.3d 128 (Wash. 2008). “" RCW 26.52.005. ś14 In 1991, following enactment of the DVPA, the legislature created an address confidentiality program (ACP), chapter 40.”
Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., Inc., 165 Wash. 2d 200 (Wash. 2008). “” RCW 26.52.005. ¶14 In 1991, following enactment of the DVPA, the legislature created an address confidentiality program (ACP), chapter 40.”
State v. Esquivel, 132 P.3d 751 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 26.52.005. Accordingly, 18 U.S.C. § 2265 states that: "Any protection order issued that is consistent with subsection (b) of this section by the court of one State or Indian tribe (the issuing State or Indian tribe) shall be accorded full faith and credit by the court of…”
State v. Esquivel, 132 P.3d 751 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 26.52.005. Accordingly, 18 U.S.C. § 2265 states that: “Any protection order issued that is consistent with subsection (b) of this section by the court of one State or Indian tribe (the issuing State or Indian tribe) shall be accorded full faith and credit by the court of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.