Wash. Rev. Code » Title 28A · Chapter 28A.405
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.405.330 (2026)

Adverse change in contract status of certificated employee, including nonrenewal of contract—Notice of appeal—Filing party—Certification and filing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The filing party, within ten days of filing the notice of appeal shall notify in writing the chair of the school board of the taking of the appeal, and within twenty days thereafter the school board shall at its expense file the complete transcript of the evidence and the papers and exhibits relating to the decision complained of, all properly certified to be correct.
[ 2016 c 93 s 3; 1990 c 33 s 398; 1969 ex.s. c 223 s 28A.58.470. Prior: 1961 c 241 s 4. Formerly RCW 28A.58.470, 28.58.470.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2012 · leading case: Weems v. North Franklin Sch. Dist., 109 Wash. App. 767 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weems v. North Franklin Sch. Dist., 109 Wash. App. 767 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “Gill’s hearing testimony — essentially that it is not misconduct to change documents to reflect critical facts.”
Weems v. North Franklin Sch. Dist., 37 P.3d 354 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “Gill's hearing testimony—essentially that it is not misconduct to change documents to reflect critical facts.”
Briggs v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 266 P.3d 911 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “RCW 28A.405.330 and its predecessors, RCW 28.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.