Wash. Rev. Code » Title 28A · Chapter 28A.710
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.180 (2026)

Charter schools—Oversight—Corrective action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Each authorizer must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.
(2) An authorizer may conduct or require oversight activities that enable the authorizer to fulfill its responsibilities under this chapter, including conducting appropriate inquiries and investigations. Examples of permitted reasons for conducting or requiring oversight activities under this section include, but are not limited to: The persistent unsatisfactory performance of a charter school; a pattern of well-founded complaints about a charter school; the authority to conduct such oversight activities as provided by statute, rule, or charter contract; or other objective circumstances.
(3) In the event that a charter school's performance, financial status, or legal compliance appears unsatisfactory, the authorizer must promptly notify the school of the perceived problem and provide reasonable opportunity for the school to remedy the problem. However, if the problem warrants revocation of the charter contract, the revocation procedures under RCW 28A.710.200 apply.
(4) An authorizer may take appropriate corrective actions or exercise sanctions short of revocation in response to apparent deficiencies in charter school performance or legal compliance. These actions or sanctions may include, if warranted, requiring a school to develop and execute a corrective action plan within a specified time frame.
[ 2023 c 356 s 8; 2016 c 241 s 118. Prior: 2013 c 2 s 218 (Initiative Measure No. 1240, approved November 6, 2012).]

Notes:

Findings—Intent—2023 c 356: See note following RCW 28A.710.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015). · cites it 2× “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot “unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools,” RCW 28A.”
Impact Pub. Schs., V. State Charter Sch. Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “RCW 28A.710.180. The Commission “must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). · cites it 2× “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). · cites it 2× “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.180(1) — 4 cases
League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot “unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools,” RCW 28A.”
Impact Pub. Schs., V. State Charter Sch. Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 28A.710.180. The Commission “must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.180(2) — 4 cases
League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot “unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools,” RCW 28A.”
Impact Pub. Schs., V. State Charter Sch. Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 28A.710.180. The Commission “must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “Charter school authorizers also monitor performance and legal compliance of charter schools, RCW 28A.710.180(1), but such oversight cannot "unduly inhibit the autonomy granted to charter schools," RCW 28A.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.180(3) — 1 case
Impact Pub. Schs., V. State Charter Sch. Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 28A.710.180. The Commission “must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.180(4) — 1 case
Impact Pub. Schs., V. State Charter Sch. Comm'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 28A.710.180. The Commission “must continually monitor the performance and legal compliance of the charter schools under its jurisdiction, including collecting and analyzing data to support ongoing evaluation according to the performance framework in the charter contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.