Wash. Rev. Code » Title 28A · Chapter 28A.710
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.230 (2026)

Facilities—State funding for common school construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Charter schools are eligible for state funding for school construction. However, such appropriations may not be made from the common school construction fund.
(2) If a school district decides to sell or lease the public school facility or property pursuant to RCW 28A.335.040 or 28A.335.120, a charter school located within the boundaries of the district has a right of first refusal to purchase or lease at fair market value a closed public school facility or property or unused portions of a public school facility or property by negotiated agreement with mutual consideration. The consideration may include the provision of educational services by the charter school.
(3) A charter school may negotiate and contract with a school district, the governing body of a public college or university, or any other public or private entity for the use of a facility for a school building at fair market rent.
(4) Public libraries, community service organizations, museums, performing arts venues, theaters, and public or private colleges and universities may provide space to charter schools within their facilities under their preexisting zoning and land use designations.
[ 2016 c 241 s 123. Prior: 2013 c 2 s 223 (Initiative Measure No. 1240, approved November 6, 2012).]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015). · cites it 2× “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). ¶10 Moreover, 1-1240’s voters’ pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). · cites it 3× “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). Moreover, I- 1240's voter's pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). Moreover, I- 1240's voter's pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.710.230(1) — 3 cases
League of Women Voters of Washington v. State, 355 P.3d 1131 (Wash. 2015). “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). ¶10 Moreover, 1-1240’s voters’ pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). Moreover, I- 1240's voter's pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
League of Women Voters of Wash. v. State (Wash. 2015). “2, § 223(1); RCW 28A.710.230(1). Moreover, I- 1240's voter's pamphlet made clear to voters that the fiscal impact of the initiative was merely to shift existing school funding from existing (common) schools to charter schools.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.