Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.04.430 (2026)
Reimbursement payment—Availability of funds
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) For any reimbursement of election costs under RCW 29A.04.420, the secretary of state shall pay within thirty days after the receipt of a properly executed and documented voucher for such expenses and the entry of an allotment from specifically appropriated funds for this purpose until those funds are exhausted. If funds appropriated for this purpose are not sufficient to pay all claims, the secretary of state shall include a budget request to the legislature during the next legislative session for sufficient funds for reimbursement of all remaining claims and shall pay all properly executed and documented vouchers to the counties within thirty days of allotment of specifically appropriated funds for this purpose. The secretary of state shall promptly notify any county that submits an incomplete or inaccurate voucher for reimbursement under RCW 29A.04.420.
(2) Funding provided in this section to counties for election costs in even-numbered years is retrospective and prospective reimbursement under RCW 43.135.060 for any new or increased responsibilities under this title.
Notes:
Effective date—2020 c 337: See note following RCW 29A.04.410.
Severability—1986 c 167: See note following RCW 29A.16.040.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Wash. State Ass'n of Counties v. State (Wash. 2022).
Wash. State Ass'n of Counties v. State (Wash. 2022). “Does RCW 29A.04.430 (Section 430), a statute that specifically governs election costs, control over the more general RCW 43.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.04.430(2) — 1 case
Wash. State Ass'n of Counties v. State (Wash. 2022). “Does RCW 29A.04.430 (Section 430), a statute that specifically governs election costs, control over the more general RCW 43.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.