Wash. Rev. Code » Title 34 · Chapter 34.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.467 (2026)

Stay

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A party may submit to the presiding or reviewing officer, as is appropriate to the stage of the proceeding, a petition for stay of effectiveness of a final order within ten days of its service unless otherwise provided by statute or stated in the final order. Disposition of the petition for stay shall be made by the presiding officer, reviewing officer, or agency head as provided by agency rule. Disposition may be made either before or after the effective date of the final order. Disposition denying a stay is not subject to judicial review.
[ 1988 c 288 s 420.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: Nw. Ecosystem All. v. Forest Practices Bd., 66 P.3d 614 (Wash. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nw. Ecosystem All. v. Forest Practices Bd., 66 P.3d 614 (Wash. 2003). “It is significant to us that there are other provisions in the APA where the word "may" is used to convey that a procedure must be followed if a person wants to achieve what is permitted.”
Nw. Ecosystem All. v. Forest Practices Bd., 149 Wash. 2d 67 (Wash. 2003). “For example, RCW 34.05.467 states that “[a] party may submit to the presiding or reviewing officer, as is appropriate to the stage of the proceeding, a petition for stay of effectiveness of a final order.”
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Washington Toxics Coalition, 843 P.2d 1092 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993). “More importantly, however, RCW 34.05.467 states: A party may submit to the presiding or reviewing officer, as is appropriate to the stage of the proceeding, a petition for stay of effectiveness of a final order within ten days of its service unless otherwise provided by statute…”
Heritage Grove v. Dep't Of Health (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “See RCW 34.05.467. It had approximately two months, from the time the Final Order issued and the time its banked-bed status expired, to do so.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.