Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 35.63.090 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All regulations shall be worked out as parts of a comprehensive plan which each commission shall prepare for the physical and other generally advantageous development of the municipality and shall be designed, among other things, to encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; to lessen traffic congestion and accidents; to secure safety from fire; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to promote a coordinated development of the unbuilt areas; to encourage the formation of neighborhood or community units; to secure an appropriate allotment of land area in new developments for all the requirements of community life; to conserve and restore natural beauty and other natural resources; to encourage and protect access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage and other public uses and requirements, including protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies. Each plan shall include a review of drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound.
[ 1985 c 126 s 1; 1984 c 253 s 1; 1979 ex.s. c 170 s 5; 1965 c 7 s 35.63.090. Prior: 1935 c 44 s 7; RRS s 9322-7.]
Notes:
Severability—1979 ex.s. c 170: See note following RCW 64.04.140.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1954–1974 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stand. Mining & Dev. Corp. v. City of Auburn, 510 P.2d 647 (Wash. 1973).
State Ex Rel. Stand. Mining & Dev. Corp. v. City of Auburn, 510 P.2d 647 (Wash. 1973). “RCW 35.63.090 provides that: [a] 11 regulations shall be worked out as parts of a comprehensive plan which each commission shall prepare for the physical and other generally advantageous development of the municipality and shall be designed, among other things, to encourage the…”
Shelton v. City of Bellevue, 435 P.2d 949 (Wash. 1968). “738, satisfactorily complied with the procedural provisions of RCW 35.63.090, 35.63.100, and 35.24.220, as such relate to the necessity for a comprehensive plan, amendments thereto, certification and filing of amendatory ordinances and maps, and the publication of such…”
Town of Selah v. Waldbauer, 525 P.2d 262 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974). “RCW 35.63.090, in discussing purposes of restrictions of planning commissions, states: All regulations shall be worked out as parts of a comprehensive plan which each commission shall prepare for the physical and other generally advantageous development of the municipality and…”
Clark v. Sunset Hills Mem'l Park, Inc., 273 P.2d 645 (Wash. 1954). “110, which provides: “For any or all of such purposes [as are set forth in RCW 35.63.090], the council or board, on recommendation of its commission, may divide the municipality or any portion thereof into districts of such size, shape and area, or may establish such official…”
City of Medina v. Rose, 418 P.2d 462 (Wash. 1966). “” It also complied with the provisions of RCW 35.63.090. 1 *452 Ordinance No. 16 provided for a population density control and set specific legal limitations on property use therein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.