Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 36.47.020 (2026)
Joint action by officers of each county
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It shall be the duty of the assessor, auditor, clerk, coroner, sheriff, superintendent of schools, treasurer, and prosecuting attorney of each county in the state, including appointive officials in charter counties heading like departments, to take such action as they jointly deem necessary to effect the coordination of the administrative programs of each county.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1999–2011 · leading case: West v. Washington Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 162 Wash. App. 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011).
West v. Washington Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 162 Wash. App. 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “Once recognized under the Washington law, counties were “empowered” to designate WACO as a “coordinating agency through which the duties imposed by [RCW 36.47.020] may be performed, harmonized, or correlated.”
West v. State, Ass'n of Cnty. Officials, 252 P.3d 406 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “Once recognized under the Washington law, counties were "empowered" to designate WACO as a "coordinating agency through which the duties imposed by [RCW 36.47.020] may be performed, harmonized, or correlated.”
Telford v. Thurston Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 974 P.2d 886 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “130, § 2 (codified as amended at RCW 36.47.020). 7 Like WSAC’s statute, WACO’s act empowered county officials to designate WACO as a coordinating agency for performing their statutory duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.