Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.320 (2026)
Comprehensive plan
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Each planning agency shall prepare a comprehensive plan for the orderly physical development of the county, or any portion thereof, and may include any land outside its boundaries which, in the judgment of the planning agency, relates to planning for the county. The plan shall be referred to as the comprehensive plan, and, after hearings by the commission and approval by motion of the board, shall be certified as the comprehensive plan. Amendments or additions to the comprehensive plan shall be similarly processed and certified.
Any comprehensive plan adopted for a portion of a county shall not be deemed invalid on the ground that the remainder of the county is not yet covered by a comprehensive plan. *This 1973 amendatory act shall also apply to comprehensive plans adopted for portions of a county prior to April 24, 1973.
Notes:
*Reviser's note: "This 1973 amendatory act" refers to 1973 1st ex.s. c 172 s 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1969–1982 · leading case: Smith v. Skagit Cnty., 453 P.2d 832 (Wash. 1969).
Smith v. Skagit Cnty., 453 P.2d 832 (Wash. 1969). “RCW 36.70.320. There is nothing casual, or perfunctory, about a certified comprehensive plan as the statutes require it to set forth a number of specific elements (RCW 36.”
Barrie v. Kitsap Cnty., 613 P.2d 1148 (Wash. 1980). “RCW 36.70.020(6) (c) and (d). "Official controls," including zoning ordinances, are "the means of translating into regulations and ordinances .”
Toandos Peninsula Ass'n v. Jefferson Cnty., 648 P.2d 448 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982). “"Official controls," including zoning ordinances, are "the means of translating into regulations and ordinances . .”
Carpenter v. Island Cnty., 577 P.2d 575 (Wash. 1978). “RCW 36.70.320 directs the county planning agency to prepare a comprehensive plan for the "orderly physical development of the county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.