Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.900 (2026)

Inclusion of findings of fact

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Both the board of adjustment and the zoning adjustor shall, in making an order, requirement, decision or determination, include in a written record of the case the findings of fact upon which the action is based.

[ 1963 c 4 s 36.70.900. Prior: 1959 c 201 s 90.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1968–2010 · leading case: Messer v. Snohomish Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 578 P.2d 50 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Messer v. Snohomish Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 578 P.2d 50 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978). “See also RCW 36.70.900. The second option authorized the board to grant a de novo hearing.”

Beach v. Bd. of Adjustment of Snohomish Cty., 438 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1968). “) And RCW 36.70.900 provides: [T]he board of adjustment .”

Beach v. Bd. of Adjustment, 438 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1968). “) And RCW 36.70.900 provides: [T]he board of adjustment .”

St. Clair v. Skagit Cnty., 715 P.2d 165 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986). “In variance cases, the Skagit County Board of Adjustment is required by RCW 36.70.900 and Skagit County Code 14.04.”

Puget Sound Med. Supply v. Dshs, 234 P.3d 246 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “070 and RCW 36.70.900. RCW 7.16.070 provides: "The writ of review must command the party to whom it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.