Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.982 (2026)

Fish enhancement projects—County's liability

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A county is not liable for adverse impacts resulting from a fish enhancement project that meets the criteria of RCW 77.55.181 and has been permitted by the department of fish and wildlife.

[ 2014 c 120 s 13; 2003 c 39 s 19; 1998 c 249 s 8.]

Notes:

Findings—Purpose—Report—Effective date—1998 c 249: See notes following RCW 77.55.181.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Gregory Regelbrugge, Apps./x-resps. v. Snohomish Cnty., Resp./x-app., 432 P.3d 859 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gregory Regelbrugge, Apps./x-resps. v. Snohomish Cnty., Resp./x-app., 432 P.3d 859 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “They contend that the cribwaii project was not property evaluated that it was not an appropriate landslide remediation measure, and that it contributed to the devastation of the siide.”

Ryan M. Pszonka v. Snohomish Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 5× “They contend that the cribwall project was not properly evaluated, that it was not an appropriate landslide remediation measure, and that it contributed to the devastation of the slide.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.