Wash. Rev. Code » Title 36 · Chapter 36.70B
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70B.050 (2026)

Local government review of project permit applications required—Objectives

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Not later than March 31, 1996, each local government shall provide by ordinance or resolution for review of project permit applications to achieve the following objectives:
(1) Combine the environmental review process, both procedural and substantive, with the procedure for review of project permits; and
(2) Except for the appeal of a determination of significance as provided in RCW 43.21C.075, provide for no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal.
[ 1995 c 347 s 406.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty., 317 P.3d 1037 (Wash. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty., 317 P.3d 1037 (Wash. 2014). “” RCW 36.70B.050(2). As a whole, the statutory scheme requires that a county that chooses to provide an appeal of its SEPA determination must provide a single simultaneous open record hearing on both the SEPA determination and the underlying action, followed by an optional…”
Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty., 287 P.3d 718 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “Such appeals are subject to the restrictions in RCW 36.70B.050 and 36.76B.060 that local governments provide no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal for permit decisions.”
Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty. (Wash. 2014). “" RCW 36.70B.050(2). As a whole, the statutory scheme requires that a county that chooses to provide an appeal of its SEPA determination must provide a single simultaneous open record hearing -17- Ellensburg Cement Products, Inc.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70B.050(2) — 2 cases
Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty., 317 P.3d 1037 (Wash. 2014). “” RCW 36.70B.050(2). As a whole, the statutory scheme requires that a county that chooses to provide an appeal of its SEPA determination must provide a single simultaneous open record hearing on both the SEPA determination and the underlying action, followed by an optional…”
Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. v. Kittitas Cnty. (Wash. 2014). “" RCW 36.70B.050(2). As a whole, the statutory scheme requires that a county that chooses to provide an appeal of its SEPA determination must provide a single simultaneous open record hearing -17- Ellensburg Cement Products, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.