Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.93.230 (2026)

Power to disband boundary review board

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a county and the cities and towns within the county have adopted a comprehensive plan and consistent development regulations pursuant to the provisions of chapter 36.70A RCW, the county may, at the discretion of the county legislative authority, disband the boundary review board in that county.

[ 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 22.]

Notes:

Section headings not law—1991 sp.s. c 32: See RCW 36.70A.902.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1993–1999 · leading case: King Cnty. v. Washington State Boundary Review Bd., 860 P.2d 1024 (Wash. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

King Cnty. v. Washington State Boundary Review Bd., 860 P.2d 1024 (Wash. 1993). · cites it 2× “At the time of the Board's decision, the only relevant alteration made by the GMA to the BRB Act was to be found in RCW 36.93.230, which was part of the 1991 amendments.”

Kitsap Cnty. Fire Prot. Dist. No. 7 v. Kitsap Cnty. Boundary Review Bd., 943 P.2d 380 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “RCW 36.93.230. The BRB is a local agency and, accordingly, the APA does not apply to appeals of BRB decisions to superior court.”

Glenrose Cmty. Ass'n v. City of Spokane, 971 P.2d 82 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “To the contrary, the court noted RCW 36.93.230 “allows counties to disband their boundary review boards after the completion of the plans required by the GMA, including designation of urban growth areas.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.