Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 37.08.200 (2026)
Rainier National Park
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Exclusive jurisdiction shall be, and the same is hereby ceded to the United States over and within all the territory that is now or may hereafter be included in that tract of land in the state of Washington, set aside for the purposes of a national park, and known as the Rainier National Park; saving, however, to the said state, the right to serve civil or criminal process within the limits of the aforesaid park, in suits or prosecutions for or on account of rights acquired, obligations incurred or crimes committed in said state, but outside of said park; and saving further to the said state the right to tax persons and corporations, their franchises and property on the lands included in said park: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, This jurisdiction shall not vest until the United States through the proper officer, notifies the governor of this state that they assume police or military jurisdiction over said park.
[ 1901 c 92 s 1; RRS s 8110.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1992–2019 · leading case: Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Dirt & Aggregate, Inc., 837 P.2d 1018 (Wash. 1992).
Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Dirt & Aggregate, Inc., 837 P.2d 1018 (Wash. 1992). “] RCW 37.08.200 (formerly Rem. Rev. Stat. § 8110).”
In re Guerra, 441 P.3d 807 (Wash. 2019). “2d 1018 (quoting RCW 37.08.200 (formerly Rem. Rev. Stat. § 8110)).”
State v. Stevens Cnty. Dist. Court Judge (Wash. 2019). “"(emphasis added)); RCW 37.08.200 ("Exc/w.sfre jurisdiction shall be .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.