Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.08.100 (2026)

Action to recover purchase money on land—Final judgment

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any action brought for the recovery of the purchase money against any person holding a contract for the purchase of lands, the party bound to perform the contract, if not the plaintiff, may be made a party, and the court in a final judgment may order the interest of purchaser to be sold or transferred to the plaintiff upon such terms as may be just, and may also order a specific performance of the contract in favor of the complainant, or the purchaser, in case a sale be ordered.

[Code 1881 s 19; 1877 p 6 s 19; 1854 p 219 s 490; RRS s 195.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2021 · leading case: Williams v. City of Seattle, 607 F. Supp. 714 (W.D. Wash. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Williams v. City of Seattle, 607 F. Supp. 714 (W.D. Wash. 1985). · cites it 2× “10 See Seattle Municipal Code § 4.08.100 (1980). The process constitutionally due Williams prior to deprivation of that property interest is determined not by the procedures set forth in the SPD Manual, but rather by the requirements of the Due Process Clause.”

City Of Seattle, Et Ano. v. Seattle Police Officers' Guild (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “SPOG asserts that there is “no dispute that the City has not complied with any part of the order in the arbitration award,” and “failing to comply with an arbitration award is a breach of 13 See Seattle Municipal Code § 4.08.100. The CBA also provides, “On indefinite suspensions…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.