Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.32.350 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A member may make an additional lump sum payment at date of retirement, not to exceed the member's accumulated contributions, to purchase additional annuity. A contribution of six percent of earnable compensation is required from each member, except as provided under RCW 41.32.013.
[ 1991 c 35 s 46; 1990 c 274 s 7; 1973 1st ex.s. c 189 s 6; 1963 ex.s. c 14 s 7; 1955 c 274 s 16; 1947 c 80 s 35; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 4995-54. Prior: 1941 c 97 s 5, part; 1939 c 86 s 5, part; 1937 c 221 s 6, part; 1931 c 115 s 4, part; 1923 c 115 s 11, part; 1917 c 163 s 10, part; Rem. Supp. 1941 s 4995-6, part.]

Notes:

Intent1991 c 35: See note following RCW 41.26.005.
FindingsEffective dateConstruction1990 c 274: See notes following RCW 41.32.010.
Severability1973 1st ex.s. c 189: See note following RCW 41.50.215.
SavingsSeverabilityEffective date1963 ex.s. c 14: See notes following RCW 41.32.010.
Members' retirement contributionsPayment by employer: RCW 41.04.445.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1980 · leading case: Newschwander v. Bd. of Trs. of Washington State Teachers' Ret. Sys., 620 P.2d 88 (Wash. 1980).
Newschwander v. Bd. of Trs. of Washington State Teachers' Ret. Sys., 620 P.2d 88 (Wash. 1980). · cites it 4× “This, however, ignores the significance of RCW 41.32.350 which, in relevant part, provides that for each year of earnable compensation a member must contribute 5 percent of his or her salary prior to July 1, 1974, and 6 percent thereafter.”
Newschwander v. Bd. of Trs. of Teachers'Ret. Sys., 620 P.2d 88 (Wash. 1980). · cites it 4× “This, however, ignores the significance of RCW 41.32.350 which, in relevant part, provides that for each year of earnable compensation a member must contribute 5 percent of his or her salary prior to July 1, 1974, and 6 percent thereafter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.