Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 44.05.130 (2026)

Challenges to plan

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

After the plan takes effect as provided in RCW 44.05.100, any registered voter may file a petition with the supreme court challenging the plan. After a modification to the redistricting plan takes effect as provided in RCW 44.05.120, any registered voter may file a petition with the supreme court challenging the amended plan. The court may consolidate any or all petitions and shall give all such petitions precedence over all other matters.

[ 1983 c 16 s 13.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2022 · leading case: In re Senate Jt. Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Senate Jt. Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012). · cites it 2× “X, § 1(b); Mass. Const, amend, art. Cl, § 3; Me.”

Soto Palmer v. Hobbs (W.D. Wash. 2022). “Intervenors, in keeping 21 1 with all other registered voters in the State of Washington, may file a petition with the state 2 Supreme Court to challenge a redistricting plan (RCW 44.05.130), but they have no role to play 3 in the redistricting process.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.