Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 48.01.010 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Title 48 RCW constitutes the insurance code.
[ 1975 1st ex.s. c 266 s 2; 1947 c 79 s .01.01; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.01.01.]
Notes:
Severability—1975 1st ex.s. c 266: "If any provision of this 1975 amendatory act, or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1975 1st ex.s. c 266 s 21.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1990–2020 · leading case: Time Oil Co. v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins., 743 F. Supp. 1400 (W.D. Wash. 1990).
Time Oil Co. v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins., 743 F. Supp. 1400 (W.D. Wash. 1990). “Defendants’ Motions Re: Occurrence An insurance policy is a contract whereby the insurer undertakes to indemnify the insured against loss, damage, or liability arising from a contingent or unknown event.”
Shah v. Allstate Ins. Co., 121 P.3d 1204 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “030 states that: The business of insurance is one affected by the public interest, requiring that all persons be actuated by good faith, abstain from deception, and practice honesty and equity in all insurance matters. Upon the insurer, the insured, and their representatives…”
Digit. Alchemy Llc v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (usa) (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “3d 885 (2009)(violating insurance statutes or regulations satisfies the public interest element of a CPA claim)(citing RCW 48.01.010(1), .030, .040); Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc.”
Nathaniel D. Cumming, Apps v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “3d 664 (2008) (citing RCW 48.01.010). These regulations define specific acts or practices by an insurer that may constitute breach of the duty to conduct its business in good faith.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.01.010(1) — 1 case
Digit. Alchemy Llc v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (usa) (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “3d 885 (2009)(violating insurance statutes or regulations satisfies the public interest element of a CPA claim)(citing RCW 48.01.010(1), .030, .040); Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.